LexGo

Consequences of intellectual property rights infringement in Luxembourg
10/07/2018

Over the last five years, the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), through the European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights (Observatory), has carried out research into the consequences of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) infringement in the EU and published the results in June (Full report available here). 

Thanks to this study, the EUIPO has been able to determine that the contribution of IPR-intensive industries to the EU economy accounts for approximately 42% of GDP and 28% of employment. However, as there is a high value associated with IPR, the infringement of those rights generates significant costs, not only to the rights owners but also to the global economy. According to EUIPO, theses losses amounted to 60 billion per year across the EU in 13 key economic sectors.

In Luxembourg, 90 million EUR are lost each year due to infringement of IPR, which represents more than 7% of losses in Europe. It also constitutes a loss of 159 EUR per inhabitant per year and more than 375 jobs lost per year. 

It is interesting to note that, whereas IPR infringements in Luxembourg represent a small percentage of losses in Europe, the revenue lost by inhabitants is above the average loss of 116 EUR per EU citizen per year. Finally, the top 2 sectors affected by lost sales, both in Europe and in Luxembourg, are leather goods and cosmetics. 

To fight IPR infringements, private companies have to invest resources, time and money. Another study carried out by the EUIPO in March 2017 on the private costs of enforcement of IPR revealed that the average company spends more than 100,000 EUR per year on enforcement activities. Of course, there is a wide variation depending on company size with average outlay between 80,000 EUR for companies with fewer than 50 employees and 150.000 EUR for those with more than 250 employees.

Related : CMS Luxembourg ( Mrs. Laure Chemla )

[+ http://www.cms-db.com]

Mrs. Laure Chemla Mrs. Laure Chemla
Senior Associate
laure.chemla@cms-dblux.com

All articles Intellectual property law

Lastest articles Intellectual property law

Implementation into Luxembourg law of EU Directive 2016/943 on trade secrets
07/09/2018

Although the implementation should have been enacted by 9 June 2018, Luxembourg has finally published, on 13 August, the f...

Read more

Debranding Before Import Not Allowed
09/08/2018

The CJEU sided with Mitsubishi and ruled that a trade mark proprietor has the right to oppose the removal by third parties...

Read more

EU Trade Marks Should Be Distinctive Throughout the EU, Not Just a Significant Part Thereof
01/08/2018

In its recent Nestlé v Mondelez decision (C-84/17P, C-85/17P and C-95/17P), the Court of Justice of the European Un...

Read more

La réforme du droit d'auteur dans l'UE : une nouvelle protection contre l'hégémonie des GAFA ?
02/07/2018

En matière de réforme visant à faciliter l’émergence d’un marché unique du ...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mrs. Laure Chemla

Implementation into Luxembourg law of EU Directive 2016/943 on trade secrets
07/09/2018

Although the implementation should have been enacted by 9 June 2018, Luxembourg has finally published, on 13 August, the f...

Read more

LexGO Network