LexGo

Exchange of information in tax matters upon request: relevant CJEU decision
09/10/2020

On 6 October 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered its judgement in Joined Cases C-245/19 Luxembourg State v B and C-246/19 Luxembourg State v B and Others in the context of the exchange of information in tax matters.

In this decision, the Court considered two references for preliminary ruling made by the Luxembourg Administrative Court. The most important points from these decisions can be summarised as follows: 

1. Where a request for exchange of information in tax matters is received by the Luxembourg tax authorities from the competent authority of another Member State, and the Luxembourg tax authorities subsequently order an information holder to communicate information for the purposes of this exchange, the information holder should have the possibility to file a claim with the Luxembourg courts against the information order. The information holder must, in this sense, be granted the benefit of the right to an effective remedy guaranteed by Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. 

2. The Court added that the taxpayer need not be given access to a direct remedy against an information order if other remedies before the various competent national courts or tribunals are available which would enable the taxpayer to obtain, in an incidental manner, an effective judicial review of the order measure. One such remedy could be a right of appeal against a correction decision or adjustment decision adopted following the investigation that gave rise to the request for exchange of information. As such, legislation preventing a taxpayer from bringing a direct action against an information order does not damage the essence of the right to an effective remedy.

3. Similarly, the exercise of the right to an effective remedy that must be available to third parties concerned (i.e. parties other than the information holder or the taxpayer and with whom the taxpayer maintains legal, banking, financial or other economic relationships) may be limited by national legislation which excludes the third parties’ bringing a direct action against the order made by the tax authorities to the information holder, provided that such third parties have an alternative remedy enabling them to obtain effective respect of their fundamental rights. One such remedy could be an action to establish liability.

4. Finally, the Court provided guidance on what constitutes “foreseeably relevant” information within the meaning of Directive 2011/16.1  According to the CJEU, the identity of the person holding the information in question, the identity of the taxpayer subject to the investigation giving rise to the request for exchange of information, as well as the period covered by that investigation are all foreseeably relevant information. Furthermore, information relating to contracts, invoices and payments which, although not expressly identified, are defined by personal, temporal and material criteria establishing their links with the investigation and the taxpayer subject to that investigation, all qualify as foreseeably relevant information. This combination of criteria is sufficient to consider that the information requested is not manifestly devoid of any foreseeable relevance, such that a more precise definition of the information is not necessary.

Concluding remarks

It will now be for the Luxembourg courts to dispose of the case in accordance with the CJEU’s guidance. We will continue monitoring these developments and provide you with the latest insights and thought leadership.

Voir aussi : Arendt ( Mr. Eric Fort ,  Mr. Alain Goebel ,  Mr. Thierry Lesage ,  Mr. Vincent Mahler )

[+ http://www.arendt.com]

Mr. Eric Fort Mr. Eric Fort
Partner
eric.fort@arendt.com
Mr. Alain Goebel Mr. Alain Goebel
Partner
alain.goebel@arendt.com
Mr. Thierry Lesage Mr. Thierry Lesage
Partner
thierry.lesage@arendt.com
Mr. Vincent Mahler Mr. Vincent Mahler
Partner
vincent.mahler@arendt.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
Tous les articles Fiscalité directe des entreprises

Derniers articles Fiscalité directe des entreprises

EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions updated: Implications for Luxembourg taxpayers
22/02/2021

Today, the EU Council updated the EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions. The update is an important step as it dire...

Read more

Bill of law passed approving the Protocol to the Luxembourg-Russia Tax Treaty
11/02/2021

At the request of the Russian authorities, Luxembourg and the Russian Federation agreed to amend the Treaty, signing the P...

Read more

New law on payments to EU ‘black-list’ countries
01/02/2021

On 28 January 2021, the Luxembourg Parliament approved bill of law n°7547 implementing measures concerning the non-tax...

Read more

Measure denying the tax deduction of interest and royalties due to entities in blacklisted jurisd...
29/01/2021

Yesterday, the draft law which introduces a measure denying under certain conditions the corporate income tax deduction of...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Eric Fort

Bill of law passed approving the Protocol to the Luxembourg-Russia Tax Treaty
11/02/2021

At the request of the Russian authorities, Luxembourg and the Russian Federation agreed to amend the Treaty, signing the P...

Read more

New law on payments to EU ‘black-list’ countries
01/02/2021

On 28 January 2021, the Luxembourg Parliament approved bill of law n°7547 implementing measures concerning the non-tax...

Read more

OECD releases helpful new guidance on transfer pricing during the pandemic
29/12/2020

On 18 December 2020, the OECD published its much-anticipated “Guidance on the Transfer Pricing Implications of the C...

Read more

Luxembourg 2021 budget law passed, new tax measures introduced
17/12/2020

On 15 December 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament approved the 2021 budget bill.

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Alain Goebel

Bill of law passed approving the Protocol to the Luxembourg-Russia Tax Treaty
11/02/2021

At the request of the Russian authorities, Luxembourg and the Russian Federation agreed to amend the Treaty, signing the P...

Read more

New law on payments to EU ‘black-list’ countries
01/02/2021

On 28 January 2021, the Luxembourg Parliament approved bill of law n°7547 implementing measures concerning the non-tax...

Read more

OECD releases helpful new guidance on transfer pricing during the pandemic
29/12/2020

On 18 December 2020, the OECD published its much-anticipated “Guidance on the Transfer Pricing Implications of the C...

Read more

Luxembourg 2021 budget law passed, new tax measures introduced
17/12/2020

On 15 December 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament approved the 2021 budget bill.

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Thierry Lesage

Bill of law passed approving the Protocol to the Luxembourg-Russia Tax Treaty
11/02/2021

At the request of the Russian authorities, Luxembourg and the Russian Federation agreed to amend the Treaty, signing the P...

Read more

New law on payments to EU ‘black-list’ countries
01/02/2021

On 28 January 2021, the Luxembourg Parliament approved bill of law n°7547 implementing measures concerning the non-tax...

Read more

Luxembourg 2021 budget law passed, new tax measures introduced
17/12/2020

On 15 December 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament approved the 2021 budget bill.

Read more

New Luxembourg circular letter on the participation exemption regime regarding Gibraltar companies
04/12/2020

llowing the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling of 2 April 2020 in case C-458-181, the Luxembourg direct tax authoritie...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Vincent Mahler

New law on payments to EU ‘black-list’ countries
01/02/2021

On 28 January 2021, the Luxembourg Parliament approved bill of law n°7547 implementing measures concerning the non-tax...

Read more

EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes: Anguilla and Barbados added, Cayman Is...
08/10/2020

In a press release issued on 6 October 2020, the Council of the EU announced its decision to make changes to the EU list o...

Read more

DAC 6 / CRS / FATCA: Luxembourg bill of law issued to postpone reporting obligations and deadlines
08/07/2020

On 6 July 2020, the Luxembourg government issued bill of law N°7625 implementing into domestic law Council Direct...

Read more

DAC 6 reporting obligations starting as from 1 October 2020
12/05/2020

On 8 May 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the EU Commission proposed a three-month postponement of the starting...

Read more

LexGO Network