European Court of Justice Confirms the Validity of the CETA Dispute Resolution Mechanism

On 30 April 2019, the ECJ confirmed that the investment court system (ICS) created by the free trade agreement between the EU and Canada (CETA) is in line with EU law. This decision paves the way for further ratifications of CETA by EU member states.

What is the ICS?

The ICS is an innovative mechanism proposed by the EU as a response to increasing public criticism of the dispute resolution systems of foreign investment regimes. It combines elements of the traditional investor-state dispute settlement system with features of judicial systems. In this hybrid model there is a permanent tribunal of first instance with publicly appointed members, instead of a panel of arbitrators selected by the parties on an ad hoc basis. There is also an appellate tribunal, to enhance the consistency of decisions and legal certainty.

Canadian and EU investors will be able to file challenges before the CETA tribunal against certain measures, such as the imposition of a fine, adopted by the respective opposite state party.

The judicial-like configuration of the ICS raised doubts as to the effects of that mechanism on the ECJ's exclusive jurisdiction over the definitive interpretation of EU law and, thus, on the autonomy of the EU legal order. There were also doubts as to the mechanism's compatibility with the general principle of equal treatment and the requirement that EU law should be effective, and as to its compliance with the right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal.

These concerns led Belgium to apply to the ECJ in 2017 for an opinion under Article 218(11) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which gives EU member states (among other parties) the right to obtain the ECJ's opinion on whether an envisaged agreement between the EU and a third country is compatible with EU primary law.

ECJ confirms compatibility with primary EU law

The ECJ stated that the power of the CETA tribunals to interpret and apply the provisions of that agreement is not incompatible with EU law, because those tribunals do not have the power to interpret and apply provisions of EU law other than those of CETA or to make decisions that could prevent EU institutions from operating in accordance with the EU constitutional framework.

In addition, the ECJ stated that CETA does not adversely affect the autonomy of the EU legal order. Furthermore, it does not undermine the effectiveness of EU law on the sole ground that an award made by the tribunal might have the effect, in exceptional circumstances, of nullifying a fine imposed by the Commission or by a competition authority of a member state for an infringement of EU competition law. Lastly, the ECJ expressed the opinion that CETA contains sufficient safeguards to ensure the independence of the members of the envisaged tribunals.

What next for CETA in the EU

Since CETA is a "mixed agreement", it requires ratification by all of the EU member states in order to fully enter into force. However, most of its provisions – but not those regarding the ICS – have applied on a provisional basis since 21 September 2017.

Thus far, CETA has been ratified by 12 member states. It is likely that more will follow now that the ECJ has ruled that the ICS is compatible with EU law. Austria and Belgium, for instance, have already expressed their intention to pursue the ratification process in light of the ECJ's decision.

Related : Nautadutilh Avocats Luxembourg Sàrl ( Mr. Vincent Wellens ,  Mr. Antoine Laniez )

[+ http://www.nautadutilh.com]

Mr. Vincent Wellens Mr. Vincent Wellens
[email protected]
Mr. Antoine Laniez Mr. Antoine Laniez
[email protected]

All articles European Law

Lastest articles European Law

Draft revised vertical regulation and guidelines

The European Commission takes a hard line against online platforms, dual distribution and MFNs

Draft revised vertical regulation and guidelines Read more

General Court of the CJ annuls State aid decision in Amazon case

The case concerned the arm’s length nature of a royalty paid by a Luxembourg operating company (LuxOpCo) to a L...

General Court of the CJ annuls State aid decision in Amazon case Read more

Favourable CJEU clarification on the VAT exemption for fund management services

On 17 June 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered its judgment in joined cases K (C-58...

Favourable CJEU clarification on the VAT exemption for fund management services Read more

Further guidance from the ECJ on VAT exemption for the management of special investment funds

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that the VAT exemption for the ‘management of special investment funds&rsq...

Further guidance from the ECJ on VAT exemption for the management of special investment funds Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Vincent Wellens

Insufficient cybersecurity measures under GDPR: 100k EUR fine in Belgium & key fines elsewhere

On 26 April 2021, the Litigation Chamber of the Belgian Data Protection Authority (BDPA) handed down its first fine specif...

Read more

Regulatory changes in the audiovisual media sector

The Act of 26 February 2021 and certain grand ducal regulations have transposed into Luxembourg law the Audiovisual Media ...

Read more

New bill brings Luxembourg to the forefront of distributed ledger technology

On 22 January 2021 Parliament approved Bill 7637, which modified:  the Law of 5 April 1993 on the financial sec...

Read more

The Sky Is Not the Limit: Space Activities in Luxembourg

At the end of 2020, Luxembourg adopted the Act of 15 December 2020 on space activities (loi du 15 décembre 2020 por...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Antoine Laniez

Bill Amending the Luxembourg Code of Civil Procedure Adopted

On 8 June 2021, Bill No 7307 ("the bill") to improve the efficiency and speed of civil and commercial proceeding...

Read more

Covid-19 and Commercial Lease Payments: Time for a Discount?

As the world continues to battle the Covid-19 pandemic, small businesses are struggling to survive, affected by successive...

Read more

Adoption of New Secondment Act

On 9 December 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament adopted a new secondment act, the purpose of which is to transpose into nati...

Read more

Contracts and commercial litigation: Covid-19 as an unforeseeable event and/or a material adverse...

For contracts governed by Luxembourg law, the parties may wish to consider if the COVID-19 outbreak has rendered the oblig...

Read more

LexGO Network