LexGo

European Commission requests Luxembourg to amend its tax rules on foreign securitisation enterprises & its ATAD law on EU securitisation vehicles
18/05/2020

Yesterday (15 May), the European Commission sent 2 letters of formal notice to Luxembourg relating to securitisation, one objecting to more heavy tax of foreign securitisation enterprises and another one asking Luxembourg to remove the ATAD interest rules “carve out” for EU regulated securitisation vehicles.

Discriminatory tax rules concerning securitisation enterprises

The European Commission decided to send a letter of formal notice to Luxembourg for taxing more heavily securitisation enterprises with taxable operations in Luxembourg whose statutory seat is in another EU or EEA Member State. The Commission considers that the legislation at issue is not compatible with the freedom of establishment of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

While no further details have been published on why the Luxembourg tax regime of securitisation companies would be discriminatory, it could be that the issue raised by the Commission is due to the fact that the Luxembourg tax provisions applicable to securitisation undertakings only apply to securitisation undertakings incorporated in Luxembourg, i.e. they would not apply to the Luxembourg permanent establishment of a securitisation entity located in a foreign jurisdiction nor to a foreign entity having its place of effective management in Luxembourg. However, in our view, this is more a theoretical than a practical issue since it is questionable why a foreign entity would be willing to perform a securitisation activity in Luxembourg under these conditions given that the entity would, in such case, still not fall within the regulatory scope of the Luxembourg securitisation law.

Should the view of the Commission be confirmed at a further stage of the procedure, Luxembourg could consider extending the scope of its securitisation tax regime to foreign entities with securitisation activities in Luxembourg. However, in our view, it would be solving a problem that doesn’t really exist and it would give rise to a number of practical regulatory and legal issues.

Implementation of the ATAD interest limitation rules & exemption of securitisation entities

The European Commission also decided to send a letter of formal notice to Luxembourg asking to correctly transpose the interest limitation rule of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (“ATAD”). The Commission considers that Luxembourg goes beyond the allowed exemption of "financial undertakings" when providing unlimited deductibility of interest for the purpose of corporate income tax to securitisation entities, which are regulated under EU regulations, but which do not in the opinion of the Commission qualify as “financial undertakings” under ATAD.

The Luxembourg law implementing the ATAD rule on the limitation to the deduction of interest provides an exemption for financial undertakings. Under Luxembourg law, securitisation undertakings that are subject to EU Regulation 2017/2402 are financial undertakings within the meaning of ATAD and are therefore exempt from the limitation to the deduction of interest. Still, should the view of the Commission be confirmed in a later stage of the procedure and should Luxembourg be required to amend its law implementing ATAD, the impact should be rather limited in our view, given that, at least in our experience, there are relatively few securitisation companies falling within the scope of EU regulation 2017/2402 that rely on the ATAD exemption applicable to financial undertakings.

Next steps

The 2 letters of formal notice are only the very first stage of the procedure. Should Luxembourg not act within the next 4 months, the European Commission may send a reasoned opinion to the Luxembourg authorities. This reasoned opinion (also an unpublished document) will provide the arguments of the Commission on why the Luxembourg securitisation tax regime is considered discriminatory. Should the discrimination issue be confirmed, the scope of the regime could be extended to foreign entities to make it EU compliant in the view of the Commission. However, to us, this would raise a number of practical regulatory issues.

Related : Atoz Luxembourg ( Mrs. Samantha Schmitz ,  Mr. Keith O'Donnell )

[+ http://www.atoz.lu]

Mrs. Samantha Schmitz Mrs. Samantha Schmitz
Chief Knowledge Officer
[email protected]
Mr. Keith O'Donnell Mr. Keith O'Donnell
Managing Partner
[email protected]

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Corporate tax

Lastest articles Corporate tax

Comparability of Investment Funds – another Finnish referral to the Court of Justice of the Eur...
22/10/2021

Recently, an Advocate General’s opinion (the “Opinion”) on Finnish CJEU case C-342/20 (the “Case&r...

Comparability of Investment Funds – another Finnish referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union – another positive signal Read more

Agreement on Pillar One and Pillar Two global tax reform
12/10/2021

On 8 October 2021, 136 out of 140 members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework officially agreed on certain key parameters ...

Agreement on Pillar One and Pillar Two global tax reform Read more

The Arm’s Length Principle And Profit Participating Loans: First Decision By Luxembourg Courts ...
24/09/2021

Our tax litigation team recently had the opportunity to assist a taxpayer in an appeal for the reversal of a decision issu...

The Arm’s Length Principle And Profit Participating Loans: First Decision By Luxembourg Courts - Tax Case Study Read more

Property companies holding real estate assets in Germany – state of play on the input VAT deduc...
17/09/2021

The case concerned a Jersey-based company, Titanium Ltd (‘Titanium’), involved in real estate and asset manage...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mrs. Samantha Schmitz

Public Country-by-Country Reporting Directive adopted by the EU Council
11/10/2021

On 28 September 2021, more than five years after it was first tabled, the so-called “public Country-by-Country Repor...

Read more

COVID-19: Luxembourg extends the possibility to hold company meetings remotely until 31 December ...
29/06/2021

Since the Covid-19 pandemic continues to impact the good governance of legal entities, the Luxembourg Government decided t...

Read more

European Commission wants a unified tax rulebook for companies: is it realistic?
21/05/2021

On 19 May 2021, the European Commission released a Communication, “Business taxation for the 21st Century”, wh...

Read more

EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions updated: Implications for Luxembourg taxpayers
22/02/2021

Today, the EU Council updated the EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions. The update is an important step as it dire...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Keith O'Donnell

Public Country-by-Country Reporting Directive adopted by the EU Council
11/10/2021

On 28 September 2021, more than five years after it was first tabled, the so-called “public Country-by-Country Repor...

Read more

Taxation of the Digital economy: What’s in the pipeline?
02/08/2021

At the end of 2020, the OECD aimed at addressing and coming to a successful conclusion on tax challenges arising from glob...

Read more

New step towards the adoption of the public country-by- country reporting (CBCR) directive
07/06/2021

On 1st June, the EU Council reached a provisional political agreement with the European Parliament’s negotiating tea...

Read more

European Commission wants a unified tax rulebook for companies: is it realistic?
21/05/2021

On 19 May 2021, the European Commission released a Communication, “Business taxation for the 21st Century”, wh...

Read more

LexGO Network