LexGo

European Commission requests Luxembourg to amend its tax rules on foreign securitisation enterprises & its ATAD law on EU securitisation vehicles
18/05/2020

Yesterday (15 May), the European Commission sent 2 letters of formal notice to Luxembourg relating to securitisation, one objecting to more heavy tax of foreign securitisation enterprises and another one asking Luxembourg to remove the ATAD interest rules “carve out” for EU regulated securitisation vehicles.

Discriminatory tax rules concerning securitisation enterprises

The European Commission decided to send a letter of formal notice to Luxembourg for taxing more heavily securitisation enterprises with taxable operations in Luxembourg whose statutory seat is in another EU or EEA Member State. The Commission considers that the legislation at issue is not compatible with the freedom of establishment of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

While no further details have been published on why the Luxembourg tax regime of securitisation companies would be discriminatory, it could be that the issue raised by the Commission is due to the fact that the Luxembourg tax provisions applicable to securitisation undertakings only apply to securitisation undertakings incorporated in Luxembourg, i.e. they would not apply to the Luxembourg permanent establishment of a securitisation entity located in a foreign jurisdiction nor to a foreign entity having its place of effective management in Luxembourg. However, in our view, this is more a theoretical than a practical issue since it is questionable why a foreign entity would be willing to perform a securitisation activity in Luxembourg under these conditions given that the entity would, in such case, still not fall within the regulatory scope of the Luxembourg securitisation law.

Should the view of the Commission be confirmed at a further stage of the procedure, Luxembourg could consider extending the scope of its securitisation tax regime to foreign entities with securitisation activities in Luxembourg. However, in our view, it would be solving a problem that doesn’t really exist and it would give rise to a number of practical regulatory and legal issues.

Implementation of the ATAD interest limitation rules & exemption of securitisation entities

The European Commission also decided to send a letter of formal notice to Luxembourg asking to correctly transpose the interest limitation rule of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (“ATAD”). The Commission considers that Luxembourg goes beyond the allowed exemption of "financial undertakings" when providing unlimited deductibility of interest for the purpose of corporate income tax to securitisation entities, which are regulated under EU regulations, but which do not in the opinion of the Commission qualify as “financial undertakings” under ATAD.

The Luxembourg law implementing the ATAD rule on the limitation to the deduction of interest provides an exemption for financial undertakings. Under Luxembourg law, securitisation undertakings that are subject to EU Regulation 2017/2402 are financial undertakings within the meaning of ATAD and are therefore exempt from the limitation to the deduction of interest. Still, should the view of the Commission be confirmed in a later stage of the procedure and should Luxembourg be required to amend its law implementing ATAD, the impact should be rather limited in our view, given that, at least in our experience, there are relatively few securitisation companies falling within the scope of EU regulation 2017/2402 that rely on the ATAD exemption applicable to financial undertakings.

Next steps

The 2 letters of formal notice are only the very first stage of the procedure. Should Luxembourg not act within the next 4 months, the European Commission may send a reasoned opinion to the Luxembourg authorities. This reasoned opinion (also an unpublished document) will provide the arguments of the Commission on why the Luxembourg securitisation tax regime is considered discriminatory. Should the discrimination issue be confirmed, the scope of the regime could be extended to foreign entities to make it EU compliant in the view of the Commission. However, to us, this would raise a number of practical regulatory issues.

Related : Atoz Luxembourg ( Mrs. Samantha Schmitz ,  Mr. Keith O'Donnell )

[+ http://www.atoz.lu]

Mrs. Samantha Schmitz Mrs. Samantha Schmitz
Chief Knowledge Officer
samantha.schmitz@atoz.lu
Mr. Keith O'Donnell Mr. Keith O'Donnell
Managing Partner
keith.odonnell@atoz.lu

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Corporate tax

Lastest articles Corporate tax

DAC6 and CRS deadline extensions – Update
05/06/2020

Yesterday, the Luxembourg Finance Ministry reported that EU Member States have agreed on a compromise proposal for a Direc...

Read more

The modification of a vertical tax consolidation group into a horizontal tax consolidation group ...
19/05/2020

On 14 May 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled on the Luxembourg tax consolidation ...

Read more

DAC 6 reporting obligations starting as from 1 October 2020
12/05/2020

On 8 May 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the EU Commission proposed a three-month postponement of the starting...

Read more

Guidance on Luxembourg CFC Rules
16/04/2020

Whilst some countries have had comprehensive rules on controlled foreign corporations for years, Luxembourg only introduce...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mrs. Samantha Schmitz

DAC6 and CRS deadline extensions – Update
05/06/2020

Yesterday, the Luxembourg Finance Ministry reported that EU Member States have agreed on a compromise proposal for a Direc...

Read more

DAC6 and CRS deadlines extended
13/05/2020

On 8 May 2020, the European Commission released a directive proposal amending the EU Directive on Administrative Cooperati...

Read more

Upcoming measure denying the tax deduction of interest and royalties to entities in blacklisted j...
28/03/2020

Yesterday (26 March), the Luxembourg Government adopted a draft law amending the Luxembourg income tax law so as to deny, ...

Read more

Luxembourg amends its CRS and FATCA Legislation
25/02/2020

On 20 February 2020, a draft law was presented to Parliament which introduces some amendments to the Luxembourg legislatio...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Keith O'Donnell

New Rules for the Digital Economy (and other Economies too...)
11/10/2019

The idea to tax the digital economy shifts slowly towards new taxation rights and new profit allocation rules that may aff...

Read more

Luxembourg starts the implementation of ATAD 2
20/08/2019

On 8 August, the draft law (the “draft law”) implementing the EU Directive 2017/952 of 29 May 2017 (“ATA...

Read more

New draft law aiming at mitigating Brexit effects and safeguarding the interests of the Luxembou...
01/02/2019

Today, a draft law was released which aims at ensuring that even in case of a hard Brexit, UK entities of the financial an...

Read more

Fidelity Funds vs the Danish Ministry – CJEU rules in favour of taxpayers
26/06/2018

Yesterday (21 June 2018), the European Court ruled in favour of a Fidelity investment fund that had suffered Danish withho...

Read more

LexGO Network