Contracts and commercial litigation: Covid-19 as an unforeseeable event and/or a material adverse change

For contracts governed by Luxembourg law, the parties may wish to consider if the COVID-19 outbreak has rendered the obligation impossible to fulfil and could thus qualify as an event of force majeure within the meaning of the Luxembourg Civil Code. Pursuant to the Luxembourg Civil Code, force majeure is deemed to arise when a contracting party's performance is prevented by an event beyond its control, the effects of which could not have been foreseen at the time the contract was entered into and avoided by appropriate measures.

In this respect, the event hindering performance of the contract should be:

(i)         external (i.e. outside the contracting party’s control),
(ii)        unforeseeable at the time of conclusion of the contract, and
(iii)       unpreventable or unavoidable (through the exercise of reasonable diligence by the contracting party).

While it is debatable whether the current coronavirus outbreak should be considered an unforeseeable event given other outbreaks in the recent past (such as SARS in 2003), it cannot be denied that the scale of the present crisis is unprecedented. The courts will have to assess if the outbreak constitutes a foreseeable contingency for which reasonable measures could have been taken by the affected party. In this regard, they could rely on guidance provided by WHO declarations and national health services.

The COVID-19 outbreak will clearly not be considered an unforeseeable event when it comes to new contracts.  

Furthermore, it should be noted that in order to be considered an event of force majeure, the outbreak must constitute a real obstacle to performance of the agreement.

The above rules apply by default to agreements governed by Luxembourg law and can be supplemented and/or derogated from by specific force majeure and/or material adverse change clauses. Such clauses are even required if the agreement is governed by foreign law, which does not always contain default rules on events of force majeure.

The fact that performance of the contract would simply be more costly or difficult remains insufficient to exempt the breaching party from liability.

In light of the foregoing, the following points should be considered in order to mitigate the contractual risk related to COVID-19 in an international environment:

  • Include express disease/epidemic wording in new contracts (including wording on the impact of delivery failure by third-party suppliers due to a viral outbreak).
  • Review and amend existing contracts, to the extent possible.
  • Consider which contracts could be impacted by closures or delays.
  • Audit suppliers and gather information from customers to assess the impact of the outbreak and prepare for potential disruptions.
  • In case of doubt as to whether an event of force majeure applies to a specific contract, seek legal advice before acting or sending communications.

Related : Nautadutilh Avocats Luxembourg Sàrl ( Mr. Vincent Wellens ,  Mr. Antoine Laniez )

[+ http://www.nautadutilh.com]

Mr. Vincent Wellens Mr. Vincent Wellens
Mr. Antoine Laniez Mr. Antoine Laniez

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Commercial practices

Lastest articles Commercial practices

Consumer law class action

Bill of law 7650 (“Bill ”), which was recently presented by the Government, aims to introduce a class act...

Consumer law class action Read more

Restructuring and Corporate Recovery measures in Luxembourg – April 2020

Luxembourg went into full Coronavirus lockdown on March 16. By the ministerial decree of 16 March 2020, the State narrowed...

Restructuring and Corporate Recovery measures in Luxembourg – April 2020 Read more

Covid-19 Impact on Luxembourg Contractual Obligations

In this unprecedented health crisis, many economic actors are facing the impossibility of fulfilling their contractual obl...

Read more

Buying alliances in Europe are under threat

On Monday 18 November 2019 the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets ("ACM") announced that the regulator ha...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Vincent Wellens

Finally some practical EDPB guidance on how to make international data transfers lawful

After a long, four-month wait, we finally have recommendations from the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) on “su...

Read more

The Court of Justice of the EU clarifies the assessment of position marks for services

The Court of Justice of the EU recently clarified the criteria to take into account when assessing the distinctive charact...

Read more

New controller-processor guidelines: beware of impact on data processing agreements

Armed with useful flowcharts to help organisations determine their role, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has pub...

Read more

Benelux Regulators to Apply EIOPA Guidelines on Outsourcing to Cloud Service Providers by Insuran...

On 24 April 2020, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) issued new guidelines on outsourcing ...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Antoine Laniez

European Court of Justice Confirms the Validity of the CETA Dispute Resolution Mechanism

On 30 April 2019, the ECJ confirmed that the investment court system (ICS) created by the free trade agreement between the...

Read more

What You Need to Know About the ICC's New Expedited Procedure

The expedited procedure of the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), in force...

Read more

The European Account Preservation Order: A Further Erosion of Bank Secrecy?

On 18 January 2017, Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 (the "Regulation") will become fully applicable. It wi...

Read more

Closing of a bankruptcy case for lack of assets does not end the bankruptcy operations in Luxembourg

According to the Court of Appeal, instead of entirely putting an end to bankruptcy operations, the decision to close the b...

Read more

LexGO Network