LexGo

Upcoming German tax law changes relevant to real estate investments
18/09/2018

On 1 August 2018, the German Ministry of Finance published the amended draft bill of the Annual Tax Act 2018 which will be subject to further discussions in the parliament in the coming months.

Furthermore, the States’ Ministers of Finance have agreed on the key points to reform the real estate transfer tax with a view to reducing tax avoidance schemes in relation to share deals. On the basis of the Ministers’ proposal, the German Ministry of Finance is expected to issue a draft law before year-end.

What are the proposed tax measures? And what will be the impact on German real estate investments made via Luxembourg? We answer these questions in our Tax Alert.

Annual Tax Act 2018

Amongst other things, the draft bill comprises the following key points in relation to investments in German real estate:

  • Capital gains on the sale of shares in property-rich companies

Currently, non-residents selling shares in property-rich companies are only subject to German taxation if the company sold has its registered seat or place of effective management in Germany. A company is considered as property-rich if, at any point in time during the 365 days preceding the sale, it derived more than 50% of its value (directly or indirectly) from German immovable property.

The draft bill extends Germany’s taxation right to the sale of foreign property-rich corporations and shall only apply to sales and increases in value after 31 December 2018. Accordingly, when a Luxembourg company sells another Luxembourg company that owns German real properties, capital gains realised upon disposal would be taxable in Germany under the new tax rules.

However, the impact of this tax law change should be limited for institutional investors. German tax law provides for a 95% exemption on capital gains realised upon disposal of a participation (under certain conditions). This exemption would also apply in cases where a Luxembourg company sells a Luxembourg property company with German real properties.

In practice, such capital gains should even benefit from a full tax exemption. Based on case law of the German Federal Tax Court, non-resident companies selling shares in German resident companies may benefit from a full exemption. This case law should also apply to the cases captured by the extended scope of the draft bill.

  • Capital gains on the disposal of German real properties

The draft bill comprises a key change for non-residents with direct investments in German real estate since the income from the sale of German real estate shall be extended and, going forward, also includes any changes in value (positive or negative) of assets in economic relation to the real estate.

In practice, this may, in particular, have an impact in the context of debt waivers for the benefit of non-resident corporations holding German real estate.

The draft bill is in contradiction to (and intends to override) a decision of the German Federal Tax Court according to which the income from such debt waivers for the benefit of a non-resident property company does not fall within the scope of the German limited taxation right in relation to German real estate.

In a tax treaty context, Germany should not have any taxation rights from such debt waivers since (i) its taxation rights under a double tax treaty are limited to the income from immovable property (which does not capture the income from a debt waiver) and (ii) the state of residence of the non-resident property company should have the taxation rights of such income.

Given that many investments in German real estate are made by Luxembourg property companies, this very issue has been a serious concern for many institutional investors in the past. The long-awaited decision of the German Federal Tax Court, which had finally brought legal certainty, may now be undermined by the new German tax rules.

From an economic perspective, the taxation of income linked to debt waivers makes no sense at all. When a debt waiver needs to be performed (before the liquidation of a property company), it means that a real estate investment was loss- making. While the losses incurred in relation to the real property should be available to offset extraordinary income in relation to debt waivers, the mechanism of German minimum tax rules would (above EUR 1m) only allow these losses to offset 60% of the income, resulting in an effective taxation of 40% of the income.

One way to circumvent this issue is to perform the debt waiver in the same fiscal year in which the German real estate is sold (at a loss) as the limitation on the use of tax losses only applies to tax losses carried forward to subsequent tax periods.

  • Real estate transfer tax (“RETT”)

The German State Ministers of Finance further proposed certain amendments to German RETT rules that may have a

major impact on investments made into German real properties.

German RETT is generally applied on the acquisition price of German real properties. The RETT rates applied in the different Federal States of Germany range from 3.5% to 6.5%. Hence, RETT is an important aspect when it comes to real estate investments in Germany.

When German real estate is owned via companies or partnerships, the transfer of shares or partnership interests may, under certain conditions, not trigger German RETT. The rules applicable in these circumstances are particularly complex and characterised by anti-abuse motives.

The following proposals are currently being discussed:

− The direct or indirect transfer of at least 95% in a German property-owning corporation triggers German real estate transfer tax (RETT). RETT is also triggered if one person reaches a shareholding of at least 95% in a German property-owning corporation.

This threshold is proposed to be reduced from 95% to 90%.

− Moreover, the direct or indirect transfer of at least 95% of the interests in a property-owning partnership to (one or more) new shareholders within five years triggers German RETT.

This provision shall be extended to property-owning corporations. Accordingly, the acquisition of 90% in a property-owning corporation by two co-investors would trigger German RETT.

Furthermore, the five year-period shall be extended to 10 years.

These proposals on RETT would result in a significant increase of RETT triggering events which would impact real estate investors and corporations alike. Despite the fact that German RETT Law provides for an exemption for group restructurings (with a fairly limited scope of application), it is very easy to trigger RETT in case of reorganisations where participations are moved within a group as even the indirect transfer of companies owning German real estate triggers German RETT.

Changes to the tax law may have a critical impact on your investments in German real estate. Our German desk, led by ATOZ Partner and Head of Transfer Pricing, Oliver R. Hoor, is uniquely placed to provide guidance and help ready your Luxembourg business in preparation for the entry into force of the law.

Voir aussi : Atoz Luxembourg ( Mr. Olivier R. Hoor ,  Mr. Andreas Medler )

[+ http://www.atoz.lu]

Mr. Olivier R. Hoor Mr. Olivier R. Hoor
Partner
[email protected]
Mr. Andreas Medler Mr. Andreas Medler
Principal
[email protected]

Tous les articles Fiscalité directe des entreprises

Derniers articles Fiscalité directe des entreprises

Taxation of the Digital economy: What’s in the pipeline?
02/08/2021

Read more

Future EU Directive tackling shell companies - ATAD 3
15/06/2021

Gradually, economic substance has become a key element in an international context and is relevant for the application of ...

Future EU Directive tackling shell companies - ATAD 3 Read more

New step towards the adoption of the public country-by- country reporting (CBCR) directive
07/06/2021

On 1st June, the EU Council reached a provisional political agreement with the European Parliament’s negotiating tea...

Read more

Political agreement reached on public country-by-country reporting
03/06/2021

On 1 June 2021, the Council of the European Union (the “Council”) reached a political agreement with the Europ...

Political agreement reached on public country-by-country reporting Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Olivier R. Hoor

COVID-19: The possibility to hold general meetings and other meetings of corporate bodies of enti...
23/09/2020

On 22 September 2020, the draft law n°7673 providing measures concerning the holding of meetings of companies and othe...

Read more

New measures for Luxembourg investment funds in the context of COVID-19
27/03/2020

Considering the development of the COVID-19 crisis, a number of new measures and communications have been issued to the at...

Read more

DAC6 – Luxembourg implements the New Reporting Obligations of Tax Intermediaries
24/03/2020

On Saturday 21 March 2020, the Luxembourg parliament passed the law implementing the Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 of 25...

Read more

Luxembourg starts the implementation of ATAD 2
20/08/2019

On 8 August, the draft law (the “draft law”) implementing the EU Directive 2017/952 of 29 May 2017 (“ATA...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Andreas Medler

Luxembourg tax authorities issue circular on interest deduction limitation rules
14/01/2021

On 8 January 2021, the Luxembourg tax authorities issued a new Circular n° 168bis/1 (the “Circular”) in or...

Read more

The German Federal Tax Court limits German CFC rules and anti-abuse provisions to wholly artifici...
24/10/2018

In a decision of the German Federal Tax Court (GFTC) from 13 June 2018 (Decision I R 94/15 published on 17 October 2018), ...

Read more

EU Court of Justice rules on the limits of anti-abuse rules
12/06/2018

On 20 December 2017, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decided on two cases involving German anti-abuse le...

Read more

LexGO Network