LexGo

European Court of Justice Confirms the Validity of the CETA Dispute Resolution Mechanism
07/05/2019

On 30 April 2019, the ECJ confirmed that the investment court system (ICS) created by the free trade agreement between the EU and Canada (CETA) is in line with EU law. This decision paves the way for further ratifications of CETA by EU member states.

What is the ICS?

The ICS is an innovative mechanism proposed by the EU as a response to increasing public criticism of the dispute resolution systems of foreign investment regimes. It combines elements of the traditional investor-state dispute settlement system with features of judicial systems. In this hybrid model there is a permanent tribunal of first instance with publicly appointed members, instead of a panel of arbitrators selected by the parties on an ad hoc basis. There is also an appellate tribunal, to enhance the consistency of decisions and legal certainty.

Canadian and EU investors will be able to file challenges before the CETA tribunal against certain measures, such as the imposition of a fine, adopted by the respective opposite state party.

The judicial-like configuration of the ICS raised doubts as to the effects of that mechanism on the ECJ's exclusive jurisdiction over the definitive interpretation of EU law and, thus, on the autonomy of the EU legal order. There were also doubts as to the mechanism's compatibility with the general principle of equal treatment and the requirement that EU law should be effective, and as to its compliance with the right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal.

These concerns led Belgium to apply to the ECJ in 2017 for an opinion under Article 218(11) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which gives EU member states (among other parties) the right to obtain the ECJ's opinion on whether an envisaged agreement between the EU and a third country is compatible with EU primary law.

ECJ confirms compatibility with primary EU law

The ECJ stated that the power of the CETA tribunals to interpret and apply the provisions of that agreement is not incompatible with EU law, because those tribunals do not have the power to interpret and apply provisions of EU law other than those of CETA or to make decisions that could prevent EU institutions from operating in accordance with the EU constitutional framework.

In addition, the ECJ stated that CETA does not adversely affect the autonomy of the EU legal order. Furthermore, it does not undermine the effectiveness of EU law on the sole ground that an award made by the tribunal might have the effect, in exceptional circumstances, of nullifying a fine imposed by the Commission or by a competition authority of a member state for an infringement of EU competition law. Lastly, the ECJ expressed the opinion that CETA contains sufficient safeguards to ensure the independence of the members of the envisaged tribunals.

What next for CETA in the EU

Since CETA is a "mixed agreement", it requires ratification by all of the EU member states in order to fully enter into force. However, most of its provisions – but not those regarding the ICS – have applied on a provisional basis since 21 September 2017.

Thus far, CETA has been ratified by 12 member states. It is likely that more will follow now that the ECJ has ruled that the ICS is compatible with EU law. Austria and Belgium, for instance, have already expressed their intention to pursue the ratification process in light of the ECJ's decision.

Voir aussi : Nautadutilh Avocats Luxembourg Sàrl ( Mr. Vincent Wellens ,  Mr. Antoine Laniez )

[+ http://www.nautadutilh.com]

Mr. Vincent Wellens Mr. Vincent Wellens
Partner
Vincent.Wellens@nautadutilh.com
Mr. Antoine Laniez Mr. Antoine Laniez
Counsel
antoine.laniez@nautadutilh.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
Tous les articles Droit Européen

Derniers articles Droit Européen

CJEU: new developments in the realm of VAT recovery on dead deal costs
20/11/2020

In the context of a prospective acquisition of shares in a company in the telecommunications sector, and with the intentio...

Read more

CJEU clarifies legality of surveillance legislation for national security
20/11/2020

Recently, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled on case C-623/171 and the joined case...

CJEU clarifies legality of surveillance legislation for national security Read more

EIOPA outlines approach on product oversight and governance
18/11/2020

EIOPA published a paper on its approach to product oversight and governance requirements for insurance distributors and ma...

EIOPA outlines approach on product oversight and governance Read more

The Court of Justice of the EU clarifies the assessment of position marks for services
15/10/2020

The Court of Justice of the EU recently clarified the criteria to take into account when assessing the distinctive charact...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Vincent Wellens

Finally some practical EDPB guidance on how to make international data transfers lawful
13/11/2020

After a long, four-month wait, we finally have recommendations from the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) on “su...

Read more

The Court of Justice of the EU clarifies the assessment of position marks for services
15/10/2020

The Court of Justice of the EU recently clarified the criteria to take into account when assessing the distinctive charact...

Read more

New controller-processor guidelines: beware of impact on data processing agreements
14/09/2020

Armed with useful flowcharts to help organisations determine their role, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has pub...

Read more

Benelux Regulators to Apply EIOPA Guidelines on Outsourcing to Cloud Service Providers by Insuran...
14/08/2020

On 24 April 2020, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) issued new guidelines on outsourcing ...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Antoine Laniez

Contracts and commercial litigation: Covid-19 as an unforeseeable event and/or a material adverse...
27/03/2020

For contracts governed by Luxembourg law, the parties may wish to consider if the COVID-19 outbreak has rendered the oblig...

Read more

Ce qu'il faut savoir sur la nouvelle procédure d'arbitrage accélérée offerte par le règlemen...
15/05/2017

La nouvelle procédure de la Cour internationale d'arbitrage de la Chambre de Commerce Internationale (CCI), en ...

Read more

Ordonnance de saisie conservatoire européenne : une nouvelle brèche dans le secret bancaire ?
18/01/2017

Le 18 janvier 2017, le règlement UE n°655/2014 (le "Règlement") devient pleinement a...

Read more

Closing of a bankruptcy case for lack of assets does not end the bankruptcy operations in Luxembourg
10/12/2015

According to the Court of Appeal, instead of entirely putting an end to bankruptcy operations, the decision to close the b...

Read more

LexGO Network