LexGo

Beneficial owner information: CJEU asked for preliminary ruling affecting justifications to temporarily restrict public access
12/10/2020

IN A PENDING CASE AGAINST LUXEMBURG BUSINESS REGISTERS, THE LUXEMBOURG DISTRICT COURT SUBMITTED A REFERRAL TO THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (CJEU) REQUESTING A PRELIMINARY RULING ON THE CONCEPT OF ‘EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES’ AS SET OUT IN ARTICLE 30(9) OF DIRECTIVE (EU) 2015/849, AS AMENDED BY DIRECTIVE (EU) 2018/843.

 

Background

The amended law of 13 January 2019 establishing the Register of Beneficial Owners (the "RBO Law") entered into force on 1 March 2019. Implementing Directives 2015/849/EU (AMLD IV) and 2018/843/EU (AMLD V), the RBO Law created a central register of beneficial owners (the “RBO”).

The RBO is accessible to the public. However, the Directives and the RBO Law provide that public access to a beneficial owner’s information can be temporarily restricted in ‘exceptional circumstances’, as further detailed in the legislation.
 

Request for preliminary ruling

The Luxembourg District Court asked the CJEU to give a preliminary ruling on the interpretation and scope of the concepts of ‘exceptional circumstances’ and ‘risk’ set out in Art. 30(9) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 and the corresponding national provisions in Art. 15(1) of the RBO Law.

In practical terms, the CJEU is asked to state the limits (if any) on the discretion of national legislation and courts in defining and applying the concept of exceptional circumstances. One objective is to clarify whether the concept of a ‘disproportionate risk’ constitutes an exceptional circumstance on its own, as well as the extent to which any risk present must be qualified.
 

Practical relevance

The outcome of this proceeding will likely clarify which justifications may be used to request a temporary restriction on public access to a beneficial owner’s information in the RBO. Please do not hesitate to contact us for practical information on how this may pertain to you.

 

Related : Arendt ( Mr. François Kremer ,  Mr. Ariel Devillers )

[+ http://www.arendt.com]

Mr. François Kremer Mr. François Kremer
Partner
[email protected]
Mr. Ariel Devillers Mr. Ariel Devillers
Senior Associate
[email protected]

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Corporate law

Lastest articles Corporate law

Contribution in kind to an SARL directly at incorporation
24/09/2021

Contributions in kind to the share capital of private limited liability companies (sociétés à respons...

Read more

Financial assistance rules not applicable to private limited liability companies (société à re...
10/09/2021

The draft law 7791 aiming at clarifying whether the rules regarding financial assistance contained in the Luxembourg law o...

Read more

Clarification of the financial assistance rules applicable to Luxembourg sociétés à responsabi...
12/08/2021

On 14 July 2021, the Luxembourg Parliament adopted a long-awaited amendment to the law of 10 August 1915 on commercial com...

Clarification of the financial assistance rules applicable to Luxembourg sociétés à responsabilité limitée Read more

Extension of the right for companies to hold meetings without physical attendance until 31 December
05/07/2021

A new law has been adopted and published on 30 June 2021 to extend, with immediate effect, until 31 December 202...

Extension of the right for companies to hold meetings without physical attendance until 31 December Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. François Kremer

Lastest articles by Mr. Ariel Devillers

LexGO Network