LexGo

Beneficial owner information: CJEU asked for preliminary ruling affecting justifications to temporarily restrict public access
12/10/2020

IN A PENDING CASE AGAINST LUXEMBURG BUSINESS REGISTERS, THE LUXEMBOURG DISTRICT COURT SUBMITTED A REFERRAL TO THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (CJEU) REQUESTING A PRELIMINARY RULING ON THE CONCEPT OF ‘EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES’ AS SET OUT IN ARTICLE 30(9) OF DIRECTIVE (EU) 2015/849, AS AMENDED BY DIRECTIVE (EU) 2018/843.

 

Background

The amended law of 13 January 2019 establishing the Register of Beneficial Owners (the "RBO Law") entered into force on 1 March 2019. Implementing Directives 2015/849/EU (AMLD IV) and 2018/843/EU (AMLD V), the RBO Law created a central register of beneficial owners (the “RBO”).

The RBO is accessible to the public. However, the Directives and the RBO Law provide that public access to a beneficial owner’s information can be temporarily restricted in ‘exceptional circumstances’, as further detailed in the legislation.
 

Request for preliminary ruling

The Luxembourg District Court asked the CJEU to give a preliminary ruling on the interpretation and scope of the concepts of ‘exceptional circumstances’ and ‘risk’ set out in Art. 30(9) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 and the corresponding national provisions in Art. 15(1) of the RBO Law.

In practical terms, the CJEU is asked to state the limits (if any) on the discretion of national legislation and courts in defining and applying the concept of exceptional circumstances. One objective is to clarify whether the concept of a ‘disproportionate risk’ constitutes an exceptional circumstance on its own, as well as the extent to which any risk present must be qualified.
 

Practical relevance

The outcome of this proceeding will likely clarify which justifications may be used to request a temporary restriction on public access to a beneficial owner’s information in the RBO. Please do not hesitate to contact us for practical information on how this may pertain to you.

 

Related : Arendt ( Mr. François Kremer ,  Mr. Ariel Devillers )

[+ http://www.arendt.com]

Mr. François Kremer Mr. François Kremer
Partner
francois.kremer@arendt.com
Mr. Ariel Devillers Mr. Ariel Devillers
Senior Associate
ariel.devillers@arendt.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
All articles Corporate law

Lastest articles Corporate law

The revised Commission merger control referral mechanism – Practical considerations for Luxembo...
09/04/2021

On 26 March 2021, the European Commission (the “Commission”) published “Commission Guidance on the ...

The revised Commission merger control referral mechanism – Practical considerations for Luxembourg M&A transactions Read more

Snapshot: SPACs - the Luxembourg alternative
02/04/2021

While SPACs have existed for decades on public markets, a revival seems to be taking place, with SPACs representing about ...

Snapshot: SPACs - the Luxembourg alternative Read more

Welcomed clarification on the financial assistance measures applicable to Luxembourg Sàrls
01/04/2021

A welcomed clarification on the financial assistance regime applicable to private limited liability companies (société...

Read more

Luxembourg positions itself as an attractive player on the rising SPAC market
24/03/2021

The market for initial public offerings by special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) has shown significant growth in r...

Luxembourg positions itself as an attractive player on the rising SPAC market Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. François Kremer

Lastest articles by Mr. Ariel Devillers

LexGO Network