LexGo

CSSF: ESMA guidelines on liquidity stress testing in UCITS and AIFs
09/10/2020

In the midst of the COVID-19 crisis, liquidity risk management is certainly a topical question, as it is meant to prepare a fund for a crisis so that it may meet redemption requests in normal and stressed conditions.

Circular 20/752

The Luxembourg Financial Sector Supervisory Authority (CSSF) issued a new circular on 29 September 2020 (Circular) to integrate the guidelines of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on liquidity stress testing (Guidelines), (initially published a year before in September 2019), into the administrative practice and regulatory approach of the CSSF.

In respect of funds, the Guidelines are relevant to all undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) and alternative investment funds (AIFs) including exchange traded funds, with the exception of unleveraged closed-ended AIFs. Provisions also apply to depositaries and national competent authorities (NCAs).

The purpose of the Guidelines is to enhance the standards, consistency and frequency to be followed by investment fund managers (IFMs) for liquidity stress testing (LST) for UCITS and AIFs and to promote supervisory convergence by national competent authorities in the European Union.

LST is defined in the Guidelines as a risk management tool within the overall liquidity risk management framework of an IFM, which simulates a range of conditions, including normal and stressed (ie extreme, unlikely or unfavourable) plausible conditions, to assess their potential impact on the funding (liability), assets, overall liquidity of a fund and the necessary follow-up action.

The Guidelines include three sections that relate respectively to IFMs, depositaries and the interaction of IFMs with NCAs. It sets out 16 guidelines applicable to IFMs in different areas. In a nutshell, in accordance with the Guidelines, IFMs are required inter alia, to:

have a strong understanding of the liquidity risks arising from the assets and liabilities of the funds they manage
regularly conduct stress tests, at least annually, under normal and exceptional liquidity conditions, to assess and monitor the liquidity risk to which their funds are exposed, taking into account the specific fund’s characteristics in question
draft, regularly review, and update as the case may be, a LST policy, which covers inter alia the governance, types, frequency and severity of stress test scenarios, the reporting process and an escalation procedure (said LST policy should be integrated in the overall risk management policy)

Furthermore, the Guidelines set forth that IFMs should notify the CSSF of material risks and actions taken to address them.

In respect of depositaries, the CSSF clarified that they are not required to assess the adequacy of the LST undertaken by an IFM. Depositaries of UCITS and AIFs should nevertheless set up appropriate verification procedures to check that the IFM has in place documented procedures for its LST programme. In case the depositary is not satisfied that LST is in place, it should take action accordingly and in line with usual actions in case of any other evidence of a potential breach of rules by an IFM.

Conclusion

IFMs must ensure they are able to comply in full with the Guidelines as both the Circular and the Guidelines entered into force on 30 September 2020. Accordingly, IFMs should take this opportunity to review their liquidity management processes and identify any changes to liquidity stress testing procedures that should be implemented and additionally, if not already in place, prepare a documented liquidity stress testing policy.

Related : Ogier ( Mr. Benoît Rose ,  Ms. Valérie Kubwimana )

[+ http://www.ogier.com]

Mr. Benoît Rose Mr. Benoît Rose
Partner
benoit.rose@ogier.com
Ms. Valérie Kubwimana Ms. Valérie Kubwimana
Associate
valerie.kubwimana@ogier.com

All articles Banking law

Lastest articles Banking law

La détection des comportements criminels au sein des entreprises via les mécanismes de lutte co...
01/03/2021

Les entreprises assujetties à la loi du 12 novembre 2004 relative à la lutte contre le blanchiment et le fin...

Read more

CSSF – 2020 Survey related to the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing
05/02/2021

The annual online survey for the year 2020 to collect standardised key information concerning money laundering and terrori...

Read more

CSSF launches its 2020 survey collecting standardised key information concerning money laundering...
02/02/2021

On 27 January 2021, the Luxembourg supervisory authority for the financial sector, the Commission de Surveillance du ...

Read more

Issuance and settlement of securities directly on blockchain: now a reality in Luxembourg
28/01/2021

Last summer in one of our e-alerts, we shared our insights on the key features of the bill of law n°7637 all...

Read more

Lastest articles by Mr. Benoît Rose

CSSF: Marketing of Foreign UCIs other than the closed-ended type to retail investors in Luxembourg
28/01/2021

On 23 December 2020, the Luxembourg financial sector supervisory authority (the CSSF) published the Regulation N°...

Read more

Luxembourg becomes first European country to launch a sustainability bond framework
21/09/2020

The Luxembourg Ministry of Finance announced on 2 September 2020 that the country had become the first European country to...

Read more

CSSF prohibition of loan investments for UCITS
27/08/2020

On 7 August 2020, the Luxembourg supervisory authority for the financial sector, the CSSF, updated its frequently asked qu...

Read more

CSSF on mandatory notifications in a no-deal Brexit context
18/07/2019

Following the publication of Luxembourg laws of 8 April 2019[1] (see our previous briefing here), the Luxembourg...

Read more

Lastest articles by Ms. Valérie Kubwimana

CSSF: Marketing of Foreign UCIs other than the closed-ended type to retail investors in Luxembourg
28/01/2021

On 23 December 2020, the Luxembourg financial sector supervisory authority (the CSSF) published the Regulation N°...

Read more

LexGO Network