LexGo

New ESMA Guidelines on performance fees in UCITS and certain types of AIFs
15/04/2020

ON 3 APRIL 2020, ESMA FINALLY ISSUED ITS LONG-AWAITED GUIDELINES ON PERFORMANCE FEES IN UCITS AND CERTAIN TYPES OF AIFS (THE “GUIDELINES”). IF ADOPTED BY THE CSSF, CERTAIN PROVISIONS IN THE GUIDELINES WILL REQUIRE MANAGERS TO REVIEW AND ADAPT THEIR PERFORMANCE FEE MODELS IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THESE NEW RULES. PROSPECTUSES AND KIIDS/KIDS WILL ALSO NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND AMENDED IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS INTRODUCED BY THE GUIDELINES.

The Guidelines are applicable to all UCITS and have been extended to AIFMs which market AIFs to retail investors in accordance with Article 43 of the AIFMD, with the exception of (a) closed-ended AIFs and (b) open-ended AIFs that are EuVECAs (or other types of venture capital AIFs), EuSEFs, private equity AIFs or real estate AIFs.

The main provisions of the Guidelines are as follows:

  • A set of minimum elements, as listed in the Guidelines, must be included in the performance fee calculation methodology.
  • The consistency of the performance fee model with the fund’s investment objectives, strategy and policy is to be checked against the parameters provided in the Guidelines.
  • The maximum performance fee crystallisation frequency is 12 months, subject to certain exemptions.
  • A positive performance must have been accrued during the performance reference period for performance fees to be payable. For performance fee models based on a benchmark index, a performance fee could be payable where the fund has overperformed the reference benchmark but had a negative performance (if a prominent warning was provided to investors).
  • A performance reference period of at least 5 years is required for performance fee models based on a benchmark index, or for high water mark models with a performance reference period shorter than the life of the fund.
  • Adequate ex-ante disclosures with respect to performance fee models are to be included in the prospectus and the key investor document, as well as in the annual and half-yearly reports on an ex-post basis.

The aim of the Guidelines is to ensure supervisory convergence regarding performance fee structures and to set out the circumstances in which performance fees can be paid. They were issued following the Consultation Paper published by ESMA on 16 July 2019 on the proposed draft guidelines, which closed on 31 October 2019.

The Guidelines will apply as from two months following the date of their publication on ESMA’s website in all EU official languages. Competent authorities will then have two months to notify ESMA as to whether they (i) comply with the Guidelines, (ii) do not comply, but intend to do so, or (iii) do not comply and do not intend to comply with the Guidelines (and the reasons for the non-compliance).

New funds created after the date of application of the Guidelines, or existing funds which introduce a performance fee for the first time after such date should comply with the Guidelines immediately.
Funds with a performance fee existing prior to the Guidelines’ application date should comply with them by the beginning of the financial year, following 6 months from the application date of the Guidelines (thus giving these managers a reasonable timeline for compliance).


To see the ESMA Guidelines in UCITS and certain types of AIFs, please click here.

 

Voir aussi : Arendt ( Mrs. Michèle Eisenhuth ,  Mrs. Fiona de Watazzi )

[+ http://www.arendt.com]

Mrs. Michèle Eisenhuth Mrs. Michèle Eisenhuth
Partner
michele.eisenhuth@arendt.com
Mrs. Fiona de Watazzi Mrs. Fiona de Watazzi
Counsel
fiona.dewatazzi@arendt.com

Tous les articles Droit financier

Derniers articles Droit financier

La détection des comportements criminels au sein des entreprises via les mécanismes de lutte co...
01/03/2021

Les entreprises assujetties à la loi du 12 novembre 2004 relative à la lutte contre le blanchiment et le fin...

Read more

CSSF – 2020 Survey related to the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing
05/02/2021

The annual online survey for the year 2020 to collect standardised key information concerning money laundering and terrori...

Read more

Parallel structures: the Luxembourg solution
02/02/2021

Parallel investment funds have increasingly become a preferred structure for sophisticated private equity fund managers se...

Read more

CSSF launches its 2020 survey collecting standardised key information concerning money laundering...
02/02/2021

On 27 January 2021, the Luxembourg supervisory authority for the financial sector, the Commission de Surveillance du ...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mrs. Michèle Eisenhuth

UCITS can no longer invest in loans
12/08/2020

The CSSF, Luxembourg’s supervisory authority for the financial sector, has announced that Luxembourg-domiciled UCITS...

Read more

UCITS KIID benchmark disclosures - the CSSF’s expectations
30/01/2020

The CSSF published a communication reminding UCITS management companies and self-managed UCITS to include the changes requ...

Read more

Regulation amending the Benchmarks Regulation published
16/12/2019

Regulation (EU) 2019/2089 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/...

Read more

IBORs: EONIA to €STR transition started today
03/10/2019

The transition from the Euro OverNight Index Average ("EONIA") to a new interest rate based exclusively on actua...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mrs. Fiona de Watazzi

LexGO Network