LexGo

Covid-19 Impact on Luxembourg Contractual Obligations
07/04/2020

In this unprecedented health crisis, many economic actors are facing the impossibility of fulfilling their contractual obligations or do not wish to honour them because they are no longer commercially viable.

As numerous contracts expressly provide for force majeure or material adverse change clauses, the parties will have to analyse if the current situation is covered by these contractual provisions and how they will deal with this scenario.

In the absence of relevant specific clauses, what are the possibilities offered by Luxembourg law?

The legal concept of force majeure

The debtor of an obligation may invoke force majeure to dissolve a contract or exonerate himself from any liability towards his co-contractor.

Without going into detail, force majeure is a legal concept provided for in our law to remedy an unforeseeable and uncontrollable situation at the time of entering into a contractual commitment that makes it impossible to perform the agreed contractual obligation.

The current pandemic and related safety measures (forced clo- sures and containment) will certainly be considered by the courts as an unforeseeable event – at least with respect to contracts entered into sufficiently in advance of the spread of the disease.

In order to claim the dissolution of a contract, its impossibility of performance must be total and definitive. A temporary or partial impossibility will not constitute a case of force majeure. A tem- porary impossibility may, however, lead to a temporary suspen- sion of the agreed obligations.

Therefore, force majeure does not relieve debtors that could theoretically comply with their contractual obligations but no longer wish to because, given the current situation, their contracts are no longer commercially viable. These specific debtors could find relief in the application of the legal unpredict- ability doctrine (imprévision).

The legal doctrine of unpredictability (imprévision)

Our courts have until now taken a very cautious approach in the application of this doctrine.

Based on the limited available case law, the minimum condi- tions to be met to benefit from this doctrine are the following:

(i) the contract must contain reciprocal obligations (i.e. both parties have obligations according to the contract),

(ii) these obligations have to be continuing obligations to be performed over time (e.g. a maintenance contract for several years), and

(iii)the economic changes that have occurred during the performance of the contract, justifying its revision must be significant, have escaped the reasonableness of the fore- casts and the action of the parties.

If these conditions are met, the debtor will have elements to argue for the dissolution of the contract.

There is no doubt that this concept will be the subject of numer- ous discussions before our courts given that the current events could not have been reasonably anticipated.

In light of the above, it should be stressed that the current pandemic does not automatically entitle a contracting party to a unilateral termination of its obligation and that every situation should be thoroughly assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Voir aussi : Luther ( Mr. Mathieu Laurent ,  Mr. Robert Goerend ,  Mrs. Marie Romero )

[+ http://www.luther-lawfirm.com]

Mr. Mathieu Laurent Mr. Mathieu Laurent
Partner
mathieu.laurent@luther-lawfirm.com
Mr. Robert Goerend Mr. Robert Goerend
Senior Associate
robert.goerend@luther-lawfirm.com
Mrs. Marie Romero Mrs. Marie Romero
Senior Associate
marie.romero@luther-lawfirm.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
Tous les articles Pratiques de commerce

Derniers articles Pratiques de commerce

Consumer law class action
27/10/2020

Bill of law 7650 (“Bill ”), which was recently presented by the Government, aims to introduce a class act...

Consumer law class action Read more

Restructuring and Corporate Recovery measures in Luxembourg – April 2020
21/04/2020

Luxembourg went into full Coronavirus lockdown on March 16. By the ministerial decree of 16 March 2020, the State narrowed...

Restructuring and Corporate Recovery measures in Luxembourg – April 2020 Read more

Contracts and commercial litigation: Covid-19 as an unforeseeable event and/or a material adverse...
27/03/2020

For contracts governed by Luxembourg law, the parties may wish to consider if the COVID-19 outbreak has rendered the oblig...

Read more

Buying alliances in Europe are under threat
05/12/2019

On Monday 18 November 2019 the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets ("ACM") announced that the regulator ha...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Mathieu Laurent

Recent significant corporate litigation case law
03/04/2018

The Luxembourg District Court had the opportunity to specify the requirements and procedure of the judicial management rep...

Read more

Amendment of the Luxembourg law on the exchange of tax information on request in sight
04/01/2018

In our newsletters Q1 and Q2 2017, we announced a paradigm shift in Luxembourg concerning the exchange of tax information ...

Read more

Implementation of the European Account Preservation Order in Luxembourg
03/08/2017

The Law of 17 May 2017 concerning the implementation of the Regulation (UE) No 655/2014 of the European Parliament and of ...

Read more

Corporate migration of overseas companies into Luxembourg
20/07/2017

There has been a rise in migration of offshore companies into Luxembourg over the past few years. A company which transfer...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Robert Goerend

Luxembourg law on the exchange of tax information on request is challenged by the Advocate Genera...
13/04/2017

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) will soon rule on the compliance of the Luxembourg law of 25 November 20...

Read more

The European cross- border bank account freezing regulation
06/04/2017

On 18th January 2017, the Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establi...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mrs. Marie Romero

LexGO Network