LexGo

CSSF clarification on triggers for licence requirements in Luxembourg
03/07/2020

A new CSSF Circular 20/743 provides more clarification on third country firms providing investment services or performing investment activities.

The CSSF has published Circular 20/743 dated 1 July 2020 which updates and provides more clarification to Circular 19/716 concerning third country firms providing investment services or performing investment activities.

Following the entry into force of the Luxembourg law of 30 May 2018 which implemented MiFID II into the Luxembourg legislation, there was no clear legal definition of when a Luxembourg licence requirement would be triggered for investment services and activities.

Article 32-1 of the Luxembourg law on the financial sector concerns third country firms providing investment services or performing investment activities and the CSSF has now made it clear that this is when carried out "in Luxembourg" and provides some guidance as to what this means.

When assessing whether a third country firm needs a Luxembourg licence there are a few questions to address:

1. Who is your client?

a. Retail clients or professional clients on request

A Luxembourg branch is required and this branch will be subject to the same conditions as Luxembourg institutions. Once approval is granted the branch will be subject to the CSSF's supervision.

b. Per se professionals or eligible counterparties

You can provide services either (i) through a Luxembourg branch, or (ii) from the third country on a cross-border basis on the basis of the ESMA equivalence decision (pursuant to MiFIR) or the "national equivalence regime".

The national equivalence regime is based on a decision by the CSSF and is available until ESMA publishes the list of equivalent countries (including the transitory period thereafter).

The CSSF has published a list of third countries it considers equivalent "CSSF publishes list of third country equivalent jurisdictions for investment services or activities" and as of today this includes Canada, Switzerland, USA, Japan, Hong Kong and Singapore. The list is made available by the CSSF and jurisdictions can be added or removed depending on the CSSF's assessment.

The national equivalence regime does not give the third country firm a European Passport or the possibility to provide services into other Member States.

2. When are you providing services "in Luxembourg"

The CSSF confirms that providing services "in Luxembourg" is considered to mean on the Luxembourg territory.

There is a presumption of providing services "in Luxembourg" in the following circumstances:

The third country firm has an establishment in Luxembourg (for example a branch);

Investment services are being provided to a retail client in Luxembourg (whether resident or temporarily in Luxembourg);

Where Luxembourg is the location of the characteristic performance of the service, meaning the essential activity for which payment is due.

As such, if clients are not retail clients (or professional upon request) there are many scenarios in which third country firms can provide investment services to a client in Luxembourg on a cross-border basis without this triggering a licensing requirement. For retail clients the reverse enquiry exemption remains available.

It is important for each third country firm to make this assessment individually and document its analysis and outcome of the assessment.

 

Voir aussi : Simmons & Simmons - Luxembourg ( Mr. Louis-Maël Cogis ,  Mr. Augustin de Longeaux ,  Mrs. Cathrine Foldberg Møller ,  Mr. Matthieu Chambon )

[+ http://www.simmons-simmons.com]

Mr. Louis-Maël Cogis Mr. Louis-Maël Cogis
Partner - Country Head
Louis-Mael.Cogis@simmons-simmons.com
Mr. Augustin de Longeaux Mr. Augustin de Longeaux
Partner
augustin.delongeaux@simmons-simmons.com
Mrs. Cathrine Foldberg Møller Mrs. Cathrine Foldberg Møller
Counsel
Cathrine.Foldberg-Moller@simmons-simmons.com
Mr. Matthieu Chambon Mr. Matthieu Chambon
Counsel
matthieu.chambon@simmons-simmons.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
Tous les articles Droit bancaire

Derniers articles Droit bancaire

CSSF Carried Out a COVID-19 Thematic Review of Issuers’ Reporting
27/11/2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has hit Luxembourg as other European countries since the beginning of the year 2020 and has adversel...

Read more

FCA communication to Luxembourg-based entities about the UK temporary permissions regime
23/11/2020

On 19 November 2020 the Luxembourg supervisory authority for the financial sector, the CSSF, issued press release 20/...

Read more

ELTIF Reform European Commission publishes consultation
02/11/2020

On 19 October 2020, the European Commission published a public consultation on the review of the European long-term invest...

Read more

New Luxembourg Draft Law Transposing CRD V and BRRD II
20/10/2020

The purpose of the draft law 7638, submitted to the Luxembourg Parliament (Chambre des Députés) on 27 July 2...

New Luxembourg Draft Law Transposing CRD V and BRRD II Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Louis-Maël Cogis

CSSF publishes list of third country equivalent jurisdictions
03/07/2020

In the absence of an equivalence decision published by ESMA pursuant to MiFID II, the CSSF has the power to adopt its own ...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Augustin de Longeaux

CSSF publishes list of third country equivalent jurisdictions
03/07/2020

In the absence of an equivalence decision published by ESMA pursuant to MiFID II, the CSSF has the power to adopt its own ...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mrs. Cathrine Foldberg Møller

CSSF publishes list of third country equivalent jurisdictions
03/07/2020

In the absence of an equivalence decision published by ESMA pursuant to MiFID II, the CSSF has the power to adopt its own ...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Matthieu Chambon

CSSF publishes list of third country equivalent jurisdictions
03/07/2020

In the absence of an equivalence decision published by ESMA pursuant to MiFID II, the CSSF has the power to adopt its own ...

Read more

LexGO Network