LexGo

Beneficial owner information: CJEU asked for preliminary ruling affecting justifications to temporarily restrict public access
12/10/2020

IN A PENDING CASE AGAINST LUXEMBURG BUSINESS REGISTERS, THE LUXEMBOURG DISTRICT COURT SUBMITTED A REFERRAL TO THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (CJEU) REQUESTING A PRELIMINARY RULING ON THE CONCEPT OF ‘EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES’ AS SET OUT IN ARTICLE 30(9) OF DIRECTIVE (EU) 2015/849, AS AMENDED BY DIRECTIVE (EU) 2018/843.

 

Background

The amended law of 13 January 2019 establishing the Register of Beneficial Owners (the "RBO Law") entered into force on 1 March 2019. Implementing Directives 2015/849/EU (AMLD IV) and 2018/843/EU (AMLD V), the RBO Law created a central register of beneficial owners (the “RBO”).

The RBO is accessible to the public. However, the Directives and the RBO Law provide that public access to a beneficial owner’s information can be temporarily restricted in ‘exceptional circumstances’, as further detailed in the legislation.
 

Request for preliminary ruling

The Luxembourg District Court asked the CJEU to give a preliminary ruling on the interpretation and scope of the concepts of ‘exceptional circumstances’ and ‘risk’ set out in Art. 30(9) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 and the corresponding national provisions in Art. 15(1) of the RBO Law.

In practical terms, the CJEU is asked to state the limits (if any) on the discretion of national legislation and courts in defining and applying the concept of exceptional circumstances. One objective is to clarify whether the concept of a ‘disproportionate risk’ constitutes an exceptional circumstance on its own, as well as the extent to which any risk present must be qualified.
 

Practical relevance

The outcome of this proceeding will likely clarify which justifications may be used to request a temporary restriction on public access to a beneficial owner’s information in the RBO. Please do not hesitate to contact us for practical information on how this may pertain to you.

 

Voir aussi : Arendt ( Mr. François Kremer ,  Mr. Ariel Devillers )

[+ http://www.arendt.com]

Mr. François Kremer Mr. François Kremer
Partner
[email protected]
Mr. Ariel Devillers Mr. Ariel Devillers
Senior Associate
[email protected]

Tous les articles Droit des sociétés

Derniers articles Droit des sociétés

Why Luxembourg became attractive for SPAC sponsors
24/05/2021

Following the boom of special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”) or “blank check companies” i...

Why Luxembourg became attractive for SPAC sponsors Read more

Luxembourg impact of EU Commission's new guidance on EU merger control referrals
11/05/2021

What's new? In a Communication of 26 Mars 2021, the European Commission published new guidance on the a...

Luxembourg impact of EU Commission's new guidance on EU merger control referrals Read more

Luxembourg Competition Council willing to review and refer M&A transactions to the European Commi...
04/05/2021

On 29 April 2021, following the release of the widely commented European Commission guidance on Art. 22 of the EU Mer...

Read more

The revised Commission merger control referral mechanism – Practical considerations for Luxembo...
09/04/2021

On 26 March 2021, the European Commission (the “Commission”) published “Commission Guidance on the ...

The revised Commission merger control referral mechanism – Practical considerations for Luxembourg M&A transactions Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. François Kremer

Derniers articles de Mr. Ariel Devillers

LexGO Network