LexGo

Beneficial owner information: CJEU asked for preliminary ruling affecting justifications to temporarily restrict public access
12/10/2020

IN A PENDING CASE AGAINST LUXEMBURG BUSINESS REGISTERS, THE LUXEMBOURG DISTRICT COURT SUBMITTED A REFERRAL TO THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (CJEU) REQUESTING A PRELIMINARY RULING ON THE CONCEPT OF ‘EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES’ AS SET OUT IN ARTICLE 30(9) OF DIRECTIVE (EU) 2015/849, AS AMENDED BY DIRECTIVE (EU) 2018/843.

 

Background

The amended law of 13 January 2019 establishing the Register of Beneficial Owners (the "RBO Law") entered into force on 1 March 2019. Implementing Directives 2015/849/EU (AMLD IV) and 2018/843/EU (AMLD V), the RBO Law created a central register of beneficial owners (the “RBO”).

The RBO is accessible to the public. However, the Directives and the RBO Law provide that public access to a beneficial owner’s information can be temporarily restricted in ‘exceptional circumstances’, as further detailed in the legislation.
 

Request for preliminary ruling

The Luxembourg District Court asked the CJEU to give a preliminary ruling on the interpretation and scope of the concepts of ‘exceptional circumstances’ and ‘risk’ set out in Art. 30(9) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 and the corresponding national provisions in Art. 15(1) of the RBO Law.

In practical terms, the CJEU is asked to state the limits (if any) on the discretion of national legislation and courts in defining and applying the concept of exceptional circumstances. One objective is to clarify whether the concept of a ‘disproportionate risk’ constitutes an exceptional circumstance on its own, as well as the extent to which any risk present must be qualified.
 

Practical relevance

The outcome of this proceeding will likely clarify which justifications may be used to request a temporary restriction on public access to a beneficial owner’s information in the RBO. Please do not hesitate to contact us for practical information on how this may pertain to you.

 

Zie ook : Arendt ( Mr. François Kremer ,  Mr. Ariel Devillers )

[+ http://www.arendt.com]

Mr. François Kremer Mr. François Kremer
Partner
francois.kremer@arendt.com
Mr. Ariel Devillers Mr. Ariel Devillers
Senior Associate
ariel.devillers@arendt.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
Alle artikels Vennootschapsrecht

Laatste artikels Vennootschapsrecht

COVID-19: Luxembourg extends the possibility to hold company meetings remotely until 30 June 2021
04/11/2020

Since the Covid-19 pandemic continues to impact the good governance of legal entities, the Luxembourg Government decided t...

Read more

Luxembourg Lower Court Delivers Judgment on the Scope of Hidden Dividend Distributions
21/10/2020

In its judgment handed down on 25 September 2020, the Lower Administrative Court (Tribunal Administratif) considered the s...

Luxembourg Lower Court Delivers Judgment on the Scope of Hidden Dividend Distributions Read more

Holding meetings in companies
29/09/2020

While the coronavirus pandemic situation continues to have an impact on the sound governance of companies and other legal ...

Read more

COVID-19 - Virtual shareholder and board meetings allowed until 31 December 2020
25/09/2020

Virtual shareholder and board meetings allowed until 31 December 2020

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. François Kremer

Laatste artikels van Mr. Ariel Devillers

LexGO Network