LexGo

Securitisation: a bill of law in favour of greater flexibility
10/02/2022

On 21 May 2021, a bill of law amending the law of 22 March 2004 on securitisation (the “Bill of Law”) was presented to the Chamber of Deputies.

Over the years Luxembourg-based securitisation vehicles have enjoyed major success, proving to be reliable and flexible instruments enabling a wide range of operations and transactions. The amendments provided for in the Bill of Law aim to further increase this flexibility and take into account global, European and local market dynamics, while retaining and strengthening other features valued by market players.

Hereinafter you will find the main features of the Bill of Law, which will benefit both existing and new securitisation vehicles. The focus will be placed on (i) new opportunities in the active management of securitisation vehicles, (ii) new extended financing arrangements for securitisation vehicles and (iii) making it easier for securitisation vehicles to securitise tangible assets.

I. Active management: an open door to CLOs

The Bill of Law provides for the option for certain securitisation vehicles to avail of the opportunities presented by active management.

More precisely, securitisation vehicles with portfolios composed of a basket of risks relating to debt securities, debt financial instruments or receivables could be actively managed to the extent that the securities issued to finance such risks are not offered to the public.

The Bill of Law clarifies that securities are deemed to be offered to the public to the extent that (i) they are not intended for professional clients within the meaning of Article 1 - 5) of the law of 5 April 1993 on the financial sector, (ii) their denomination is less than EUR 100,000 and (iii) they are not distributed in the form of a private placement. These criteria are cumulative.

The active management could be performed internally or by a third party. It would then be possible for a securitisation vehicle to appoint an asset manager or advisor to actively manage the portfolio. Loan selection activity and reinvestment or restructuring decisions could be delegated to the manager/advisor by the securitisation vehicle in a way similar to that already known in the market for collateralised loan obligations (CLOs).

II. Borrowing arrangements: removal of limits

From the entry into force of the amendments, securitisation vehicles would be able to incur indebtedness by way of borrowing in order to finance, wholly or in part, the acquisition of underlying assets, with the value or return of such borrowing dependent on the risks securitised.

There is no precise definition of borrowing, as the intention of the legislator is to permit any form of indebtedness that gives rise to a repayment obligation on the securitisation vehicle. This approach enables alignment with Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 laying down a general framework for securitisation and creating a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation.

The Bill of Law supplements this new possibility by enlarging the scope of security interests that can be granted by a securitisation vehicle. More precisely, it would become possible for securitisation vehicles to grant any kind of security interests in order to secure relevant obligations relating to securitisation transactions. Accordingly, security interests could be granted to third parties other than investors in the securitisation vehicle.

III. Easier securitisation of tangible assets

Both tangible and intangible assets can be securitised. However, in practice, securitisation of tangible assets such as commodities, planes or boats has been challenging.

There would now be certainty about securitisation vehicles’ ability to securitise such assets directly and indirectly, in particular through a company wholly or partially owned by the securitisation vehicle. This direct or indirect acquisition of the assets should not, however, be understood as an option to develop a commercial or entrepreneurial activity, which remains prohibited for securitisation vehicles. Concretely, it means that transfer or acquisition of ownership of the underlying assets to an entity owned by the securitisation vehicle could be used as a tool for refinancing the asset concerned.

Aircrafts, ships, satellites and containers will be more welcome in Luxembourg than ever.

IV. New forms of companies

Securitisation will become accessible to new forms of companies such as the very popular common limited partnership (SCS) and special limited partnership (SCSp), but also the unlimited company (SNC) and the simplified limited company (SAS), adding a number of new opportunities for structuring transactions – notably through efficient, tax-transparent vehicles.

V. Legal Subordination

The law will provide for a welcome set of subordination rules applicable to the various financial instruments available for securitisation vehicles.

Junior financial instruments will be subordinated to senior ones, with the option for the securitisation vehicle to contractually opt for a different order. More precisely, the law states that (i) units issued by a securitisation fund will be subordinated to the other financial instruments by, or borrowings entered into by, such securitisation fund. In respect of securitisation companies, the following ranking applies: (i) shares or partnership interests (depending on the legal form of the company) are subordinated to the other financial instruments issued by, or borrowings entered into by, the securitisation company; (ii) shares or partnership interests (depending on the legal form of the company) are subordinated to the beneficiary units issued by the same securitisation company; (iii) the beneficiary units are subordinated to debt financial instruments issued by, or borrowings entered into by, the same securitisation company and (iv) non-fixed-rate debt financial instruments are subordinated to fixed-rate debt financial instruments issued by the same securitisation undertaking.

VI. Tax implications

The Bill of Law is a welcome measure fostering the continued attractiveness of Luxembourg securitisation vehicles. While no tax provisions have been inserted, the current tax regime remains of great interest in this context. It is important to note that Luxembourg securitisation vehicles taking the form of corporate vehicles are fully taxable. However, they can be rendered tax neutral thanks to the ability to deduct from their taxable base commitments made to shareholders and bondholders, and the absence of withholding tax. As fully taxable resident entities, they enjoy the benefits of double tax treaties and European tax directives (such as the parent subsidiary directive). One should nevertheless consider the impact of the new interest limitation and anti-hybrid rules resulting from the implementation of the EU anti-tax avoidance directives (ATAD). Services provided to a securitisation company are, as a rule, exempt from VAT.

VII. Next steps and how we can help

Arendt will be delighted to assist you in better understanding the Bill of Law and the opportunities it creates for your existing and new vehicles.

Our multi-disciplinary team of legal professionals, tax experts, regulatory/compliance experts and corporate services specialists will provide you with a fully integrated solution customised to your set-up and specific requirements.

 

MATTHIEU TAILLANDIER - Partner

LYNN ALZIN - Counsel

THOMAS ALLAIN - Senior Associate

LAURA ARCHANGE - Senior Associate
 

Zie ook : Arendt

[+ http://www.arendt.com]


Alle artikels Bank -en Krediet recht

Laatste artikels Bank -en Krediet recht

CSSF AML/CFT reporting tool: first reporting period approaches
21/06/2022

Following the publication of three circular letters [1] in December 2021 introducing new prudential and AML...

Read more

Introduction of a New eDesk Module – ePassporting
21/06/2022

Following the publication on 12 May 2022 of CSSF Circular 22/810 on pre-marketing and cross-border marketing notification ...

Read more

EU debates how to apply travel rule to cryptoassets
21/06/2022

Electronic payment transactions in the EU generally need to be accompanied by information about the payer and payee. EU la...

EU debates how to apply travel rule to cryptoassets Read more

EBA guidelines on the role and responsibilities of the AML/CFT Compliance Officer
19/06/2022

On 14 June 2022, the European Banking Authority (“EBA”) released its guidelines on policies and procedures in ...

EBA guidelines on the role and responsibilities of the AML/CFT Compliance Officer Read more

LexGO Network