LexGo

ESMA Guidelines on performance fees in UCITS and certain types of AIFs
17/12/2020

Background

On 3 April 2020, ESMA eventually released its much-anticipated final report on guidelines on performance fees in UCITS and certain types of AIFs, including the guidelines themselves (the “Guidelines”).

As a reminder, these Guidelines aim at harmonising the way fund managers charge performance fees to retail investors, as well as the circumstances in which performance fees can be paid and are disclosed to investors of investment funds falling within the scope of the Guidelines. The common requirements will allow convergence on the supervision by competent authorities of performance fees models across the European Union.

Scope

The Guidelines apply to (i) all UCITS and (ii) open-end AIFs marketed to retail investors in accordance with Article 43 of the AIFM Directive (the “Funds”) in order to ensure a level playing field and a consistent level of protection to retail investors. The Guidelines do not apply:

  • to closed-ended AIFs; and
  • to open-ended AIFs that are EuVECAs (or other types of venture capital AIFs), EuSEFs, private equity or real estate AIFs.

Entry into force

On 5 November 2020, ESMA issued the official translations of the Guidelines which means that the Guidelines will enter into force two months after this publication date, i.e. 6 January 2021 (the “Application Date”).

The Guidelines will apply immediately to new Funds created after the Application Date, and to any existing Funds implementing a performance fee for the first time after the Application Date.

Funds with a performance fee existing prior to the Application Date should comply with the Guidelinesas of the financial year following six months from the Application Date (i.e. after 6 July 2021), thereby giving the Funds and their managers a timeline for compliance. This means that for Funds having the calendar year as their financial year, the Guidelines will apply as of 1 January 2022.

Outlook

Adoption of the Guidelines by the CSSF will require the Funds and their managers to review their performance fee models and, if deemed necessary, adapt them in light of the Guidelines. Similarly, the disclosure requirements laid down by the Guidelines will need to be taken into account and implemented when reviewing the relevant fund documentation (e.g. prospectuses and KIIDs).

For a practical assessment of the impact of the Guidelines on your Fund, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Zie ook : CMS Luxembourg ( Mr. Aurélien Hollard ,  Mr. Benjamin Bada ,  Mr. Gilles Bropsom )

[+ http://www.cms-db.com]

Mr. Aurélien Hollard Mr. Aurélien Hollard
Partner
[email protected]
Mr. Benjamin Bada Mr. Benjamin Bada
Partner
[email protected]
Mr. Gilles Bropsom Mr. Gilles Bropsom
Senior Associate
[email protected]

Click here to see the ad(s)
Alle artikels Bank -en Krediet recht

Laatste artikels Bank -en Krediet recht

CSSF Circular 22/811 - Authorisation and Organisation of Entities Acting as UCI Administrators
19/05/2022

On 16 May 2022, the Luxembourg financial regulator (the "CSSF") released Circular 22/811 on the authorisation an...

Read more

CSSF Circular 22/810 - Pre-marketing and Cross-border Marketing Notification Procedures
18/05/2022

On 12 May 2022, the CSSF published Circular 22/810 on the procedures to be followed by Luxembourg-based undertakings for c...

Read more

New CSSF Circular on UCI Administrators
17/05/2022

The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier issued a circular regarding the authorisation and organisation of enti...

Read more

Luxembourg regulator published a guidance for consumers in the context of virtual assets
09/05/2022

On 27 April 2022, the CSSF published a guidance for consumers in the context of virtual assets (the “Guidance”...

Luxembourg regulator published a guidance for consumers in the context of virtual assets Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Aurélien Hollard

The ESAs published a revised Supervisory Statement on the application of SFDR
01/04/2022

Despite Level 1 of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) being applicable for over a year, the Level 2 requ...

Read more

Paving the way for sustainable securitisation?
28/03/2022

Over the last few years, the financial sector has steadily embraced the development of various sets of regulations related...

Read more

Luxembourg Securitisation: Law new changes and new opportunities
04/03/2022

Securitisation vehicles (SVs) in Luxembourg are governed by the Law of 22 March 2004, as amended.

Read more

The ESAs delivered final draft RTS related to the SFDR 2019/2088 and Taxonomy Regulation 2020/852...
02/11/2021

Despite the main disclosures required pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 on sustainability-related disclosures in the f...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Benjamin Bada

With the implementation of SFDR approaching, the CSSF sets-up a fast track procedure
22/12/2020

With less less than 3 months to go until the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (“SFDR”) comes int...

Read more

Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation: the CSSF confirms that the compliance date remains 10 ...
26/11/2020

The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the “CSSF”) has published a press release&...

Read more

Certain deadlines extended by financial sector laws during the crisis
03/07/2020

On 7 May 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament adopted a new law extending certain deadlines during the crisis as provided for i...

Read more

Coronavirus (COVID-19): Extension of CSSF reporting deadlines applicable to regulated entities
01/04/2020

On 30 March 2020, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the CSSF) issued an updated ver...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Gilles Bropsom

LexGO Network