LexGo

ESMA Guidelines on performance fees in UCITS and certain types of AIFs
17/12/2020

Background

On 3 April 2020, ESMA eventually released its much-anticipated final report on guidelines on performance fees in UCITS and certain types of AIFs, including the guidelines themselves (the “Guidelines”).

As a reminder, these Guidelines aim at harmonising the way fund managers charge performance fees to retail investors, as well as the circumstances in which performance fees can be paid and are disclosed to investors of investment funds falling within the scope of the Guidelines. The common requirements will allow convergence on the supervision by competent authorities of performance fees models across the European Union.

Scope

The Guidelines apply to (i) all UCITS and (ii) open-end AIFs marketed to retail investors in accordance with Article 43 of the AIFM Directive (the “Funds”) in order to ensure a level playing field and a consistent level of protection to retail investors. The Guidelines do not apply:

  • to closed-ended AIFs; and
  • to open-ended AIFs that are EuVECAs (or other types of venture capital AIFs), EuSEFs, private equity or real estate AIFs.

Entry into force

On 5 November 2020, ESMA issued the official translations of the Guidelines which means that the Guidelines will enter into force two months after this publication date, i.e. 6 January 2021 (the “Application Date”).

The Guidelines will apply immediately to new Funds created after the Application Date, and to any existing Funds implementing a performance fee for the first time after the Application Date.

Funds with a performance fee existing prior to the Application Date should comply with the Guidelinesas of the financial year following six months from the Application Date (i.e. after 6 July 2021), thereby giving the Funds and their managers a timeline for compliance. This means that for Funds having the calendar year as their financial year, the Guidelines will apply as of 1 January 2022.

Outlook

Adoption of the Guidelines by the CSSF will require the Funds and their managers to review their performance fee models and, if deemed necessary, adapt them in light of the Guidelines. Similarly, the disclosure requirements laid down by the Guidelines will need to be taken into account and implemented when reviewing the relevant fund documentation (e.g. prospectuses and KIIDs).

For a practical assessment of the impact of the Guidelines on your Fund, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Zie ook : CMS Luxembourg ( Mr. Aurélien Hollard ,  Mr. Benjamin Bada ,  Mr. Gilles Bropsom )

[+ http://www.cms-db.com]

Mr. Aurélien Hollard Mr. Aurélien Hollard
Partner
[email protected]
Mr. Benjamin Bada Mr. Benjamin Bada
Partner
[email protected]
Mr. Gilles Bropsom Mr. Gilles Bropsom
Senior Associate
[email protected]

Click here to see the ad(s)
Alle artikels Bank -en Krediet recht

Laatste artikels Bank -en Krediet recht

Comparability of Investment Funds – another Finnish referral to the Court of Justice of the Eur...
22/10/2021

Recently, an Advocate General’s opinion (the “Opinion”) on Finnish CJEU case C-342/20 (the “Case&r...

Comparability of Investment Funds – another Finnish referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union – another positive signal Read more

New rules on material IT outsourcing in the financial sector
15/10/2021

Effective 15 October 2021, financial institutions must notify the CSSF of any planned outsourcing of material IT activitie...

Read more

Payments services and e-money | New delegated regulation
15/10/2021

On 28 September 2021, the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1722 of 18 June 2021 (the “Regulation”), s...

Payments services and e-money | New delegated regulation Read more

Performance fees: the CSSF digitalises data collection
12/10/2021

Investment fund managers must report to the CSSF on the performance fee models used by all Luxembourg UCITS and AIFs that ...

Performance fees: the CSSF digitalises data collection Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Aurélien Hollard

Issuance and settlement of securities directly on blockchain: now a reality in Luxembourg
28/01/2021

Last summer in one of our e-alerts, we shared our insights on the key features of the bill of law n°7637 all...

Read more

With the implementation of SFDR approaching, the CSSF sets-up a fast track procedure
22/12/2020

With less less than 3 months to go until the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (“SFDR”) comes int...

Read more

Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation: the CSSF confirms that the compliance date remains 10 ...
26/11/2020

The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the “CSSF”) has published a press release&...

Read more

Certain deadlines extended by financial sector laws during the crisis
03/07/2020

On 7 May 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament adopted a new law extending certain deadlines during the crisis as provided for i...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Benjamin Bada

With the implementation of SFDR approaching, the CSSF sets-up a fast track procedure
22/12/2020

With less less than 3 months to go until the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (“SFDR”) comes int...

Read more

Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation: the CSSF confirms that the compliance date remains 10 ...
26/11/2020

The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the “CSSF”) has published a press release&...

Read more

Certain deadlines extended by financial sector laws during the crisis
03/07/2020

On 7 May 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament adopted a new law extending certain deadlines during the crisis as provided for i...

Read more

Coronavirus (COVID-19): Extension of CSSF reporting deadlines applicable to regulated entities
01/04/2020

On 30 March 2020, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the CSSF) issued an updated ver...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Gilles Bropsom

LexGO Network