European Supervisory Authorities - Legality and judicial control of their activity

On 4 December 2019, the French Conseil d'Etat, at the request of the French Banking Federation, referred important questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling regarding the legality of the activities of the European supervisory authorities for the financial services sector (ESAs) (see Annex 1 here).

The CJEU has been asked to rule on the extent to which the European Banking Authority was competent to adopt a guideline on retail product governance.

Even if the matter only concerns directly the European Banking Authority and relates only to one given position, the CJEU's ruling will apply to all three ESAs, including therefore the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA). It is likely to be relevant to all acts adopted by ESAs of so-called “level III” authority, i.e. recommendations, guidelines, "mere" opinions, but also atypical acts in Q&A form. 

The CJEU will have to consider in advance how a request for a review of the legality of the acts of ESAs may be referred to it. Can these acts give rise to actions for annulment before the General Court of the European Union and on whose initiative may this be undertaken (banking, financial and insurance operators or their professional associations)? If the answer is in the affirmative, can they nevertheless also be referred for a preliminary ruling on validity by the national courts to the CJEU?

This case may mark the beginning of the end of the tendency of ESAs to arguably exceed their powers – to which attention has already been drawn, see Annex 2 here). In this regard, it is worthwhile recalling ESMA's opinion on share classes in the field of investment funds.

The mere existence of this reference for a preliminary ruling on validity should, even before the CJEU's judgment is rendered, incite the ESAs to pay more attention to applicable rules stemming from European Union law. At the very least, it should encourage them to be more careful as regards objections under European Union law linked to the limits of their powers which banking, financial and insurance operators and their professional associations may raise.

We will keep you informed of developments in this case, which falls within the broader context of the increasing judicial review of the acts of European monetary, banking and financial authorities, as evidenced by recent case law vis-à-vis the European Central Bank and the Single Resolution Council.

Zie ook : Arendt ( Mr. Philippe-Emmanuel Partsch )

[+ http://www.arendt.com]

Mr. Philippe-Emmanuel Partsch Mr. Philippe-Emmanuel Partsch

Click here to see the ad(s)
Alle artikels Bank -en Krediet recht

Laatste artikels Bank -en Krediet recht

New prudential framework for investment firms published

The directive (EU) 2019/2034 and regulation (EU) 2019/2033 on the prudential requirements of investment firms were publish...

New prudential framework for investment firms published Read more

Reaching year-end, here are the latest AML communications from the CSSF

The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the “CSSF”) has communicated several press rele...

Read more

New transparency rules in Luxembourg

New transparency rules in Luxembourg: identification of the beneficial ownership of trusts, fiducies and of similar ...

Read more

Strong customer authentication for e-commerce card payment transactions: an EU harmonised extensi...

Following its June opinion on the possibility for national competent authorities to work with payment service providers an...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Philippe-Emmanuel Partsch

Towards a single European market on private pensions - the Pan-European Personal Pension Product

Saving for retirement will soon be facilitated by a personal pension product with truly pan- European characteristics. On ...

Read more

Sales practices: geo-blocking and territorial segmentation of the market becoming more difficult ...

Since 3 December 2018, EU Regulation 2018/302 on addressing unjustified geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination bas...

Read more

Brexit: the UK may unilaterally back out

In today’s judgment (07.12), the Court of Justice of the European Union, sitting in full court, has followed the opi...

Read more

Preliminary opinion of EU Court of Justice suggests that United Kingdom could still avoid Brexit

On 4 December, EU Court of Justice Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona concluded that the United Kingdom may un...

Read more

LexGO Network