LexGo

Property companies holding real estate assets in Germany – state of play on the input VAT deduction right
17/09/2021

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (‘CJEU’) CONFIRMED IN DECISION C-931/19 OF 3 JUNE 2021 THAT THE LETTING OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY ABROAD, WHERE THE PROPERTY OWNER DOES NOT HAVE ITS OWN STAFF TO PERFORM LETTING-RELATED SERVICES, DOES NOT GIVE RISE TO A FIXED ESTABLISHMENT FOR VAT PURPOSES IN THE COUNTRY WHERE THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED.

Background


The case concerned a Jersey-based company, Titanium Ltd (‘Titanium’), involved in real estate and asset management activities.

In the context of those activities, Titanium owned a property located in Austria which it let to local businesses. Beyond the letting of this property, Titanium performed no other economic activity in Austria. For the purposes of this specific real estate activity, Titanium designated a local real estate management company to perform property management, which included tasks such as invoicing rent, maintaining business records and preparing data for VAT returns. However, the whole decision-making process, including decisions to start or end rental agreements, set the conditions of such agreements, make investments or have repairs carried out on the property, arrange financing and choose service providers, including the property management company, continued to reside with Titanium.

In Titanium’s view, it was not liable to pay VAT related to the letting activity on the basis that it did not have a fixed establishment in Austria.

This position was contested by the Austrian tax authorities, which submitted that the letting of immovable property constituted a fixed establishment and, as a consequence, VAT was due from Titanium in Austria. Bringing an action in the local courts against the position of the local tax authorities, Titanium argued that holding and letting immovable property, without having any staff of its own locally, could not constitute a fixed establishment for the purposes of VAT. In the course of the dispute, a question was referred to the CJEU to clarify whether the concept of ‘fixed establishment’ always requires the existence of both human and technical resources (i.e. having the business’ own staff present at the establishment), or whether the letting of property without having human resources on site to perform letting-related services could also constitute a fixed establishment for VAT purposes.
 

CJEU judgment


The CJEU recalled that the concept of ‘fixed establishment’ presupposes a sufficient degree of permanence and an appropriate structure with respect to the human and technical resources necessary to perform a given economic activity in an independent manner at the place of establishment. As a consequence, the CJEU ruled that a property not accompanied by the owner company’s own human resources at the property location enabling the company to act independently did not constitute a fixed establishment for VAT purposes.

This judgment provides further clarification around the evolving concept of a fixed establishment for VAT purposes that assists in determining the applicable location for services and for persons liable to pay VAT, in this instance with a focus on real estate activity. It should therefore be taken into consideration when structuring real estate activities within the EU.
 

Zie ook : Arendt ( Mr. Bruno Gasparotto ,  Mrs. Sophie Weyten ,  Mrs. Claire Schmitt ,  Mrs. Aleksandra Gburzynska )

[+ http://www.arendt.com]

Mr. Bruno Gasparotto Mr. Bruno Gasparotto
Partner
[email protected]
Mrs. Sophie Weyten Mrs. Sophie Weyten
Counsel
[email protected]
Mrs. Claire Schmitt Mrs. Claire Schmitt
Senior Associate
[email protected]
Mrs. Aleksandra Gburzynska Mrs. Aleksandra Gburzynska
Senior Associate
[email protected]

Alle artikels Vennootschapsbelasting

Laatste artikels Vennootschapsbelasting

Impôt minimum mondial : un bref état des lieux des dernières avancées
25/11/2021

 L’intégration des économies et des marchés nationaux a connu une accélérati...

Read more

New taxonomy-related disclosures RTS published
27/10/2021

Despite the delay to Level II1 announced by the European Commission (“EC”) at the beginning of the summer...

New taxonomy-related disclosures RTS published Read more

Sustainable Finance update (asset management): Final Report on SFDR RTS regarding taxonomy-relate...
26/10/2021

On 22 October 2021, the European Supervisory Authorities or ESAs (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA)  presented the European Commis...

Sustainable Finance update (asset management): Final Report on SFDR RTS regarding taxonomy-related disclosures Read more

Comparability of Investment Funds – another Finnish referral to the Court of Justice of the Eur...
22/10/2021

Recently, an Advocate General’s opinion (the “Opinion”) on Finnish CJEU case C-342/20 (the “Case&r...

Comparability of Investment Funds – another Finnish referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union – another positive signal Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Bruno Gasparotto

New VAT burden on company cars?
25/01/2021

On 20 January 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling in a case that raised the question o...

Read more

Overview of the VAT impacts of Brexit
12/01/2021

With the end of the transition period as of 1 January 2021, the UK officially became a third country with respect to the E...

Read more

Luxembourg 2021 budget law passed, new tax measures introduced
17/12/2020

On 15 December 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament approved the 2021 budget bill.

Read more

CJEU: new developments in the realm of VAT recovery on dead deal costs
20/11/2020

In the context of a prospective acquisition of shares in a company in the telecommunications sector, and with the intentio...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mrs. Sophie Weyten

The BlackRock VAT case: an impossible combination of artificial intelligence and the VAT exemption?
06/07/2020

On 2 July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled in the case of BlackRock Investment ...

Read more

VAT “Quick Fixes”: simplifications and challenges for Luxembourg businesses
22/01/2020

On 23 December 2019, the Luxembourg VAT authorities issued Circular n°799, outlining the main legislative changes in L...

Read more

Rent free period and lease contracts: new VAT developments
25/07/2019

The rent free period commonly granted in office lease contracts has been the source of much heated debate with the Luxembo...

Read more

VAT Circular on transactions between related parties
25/01/2019

On 18 January 2019, the Luxembourg VAT authorities published a new Circular (N°790), which clarifies the provisions of...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mrs. Claire Schmitt

Overview of the VAT impacts of Brexit
12/01/2021

With the end of the transition period as of 1 January 2021, the UK officially became a third country with respect to the E...

Read more

The BlackRock VAT case: an impossible combination of artificial intelligence and the VAT exemption?
06/07/2020

On 2 July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled in the case of BlackRock Investment ...

Read more

VAT “Quick Fixes”: simplifications and challenges for Luxembourg businesses
22/01/2020

On 23 December 2019, the Luxembourg VAT authorities issued Circular n°799, outlining the main legislative changes in L...

Read more

Rent free period and lease contracts: new VAT developments
25/07/2019

The rent free period commonly granted in office lease contracts has been the source of much heated debate with the Luxembo...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mrs. Aleksandra Gburzynska

LexGO Network