LexGo

OECD releases helpful new guidance on transfer pricing during the pandemic
29/12/2020

On 18 December 2020, the OECD published its much-anticipated “Guidance on the Transfer Pricing Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic”.

It is clear that government restrictions and trading difficulties have created an environment in which existing transfer pricing policies will not always be appropriate. The OECD has done well to reach rapid consensus among its members on four key transfer pricing topics, namely: comparability analysis, losses and the allocation of COVID-19-specific costs, government assistance programmes and advance pricing agreements (APAs). It is hoped that taxpayers and tax administrations will be able to apply this guidance and circumvent the increase in disputes that would otherwise emerge.

The guidance begins by noting that the first task incumbent upon businesses is to document how they have been affected by the crisis, contemporaneously with the occurrence of the impacts.

Comparability analysis

The OECD states that where a multi-year transfer pricing agreement is in place which specifies a fixed price, there is no need to carry out new benchmarking for the present year, provided – crucially – that arm’s-length parties would not seek to renegotiate the agreement. Where new benchmarking is required, adjustments to pre-pandemic database figures should be considered in light of the effects of lower sales and capacity utilisation, additional costs, and government restrictions and assistance. These might be measured by comparing interim company figures with those from the previous year or with the budget for the current year, or by adjusting older comparables by reference to public information for the current year on developments in the industry or whole economy. Regression analysis could be used to calculate impacts in this way. However, the guidance warns against using information from the previous crisis in 2008-2009.

Losses and the allocation of COVID-19-specific costs

The guidance emphasises that the starting point for allocating losses is the contractual allocation of risks between the parties, taking care to consider whether certain costs may not be covered by the agreement at all. It is acceptable even for “low-risk” parties to bear losses in the short run; for example, if sales fall dramatically enough. However, taxpayers should consider whether it would be in the longer-term interests of the parties – if they were independent – to be flexible about adherence to the agreement in the short term, or even to negotiate a different longer-term arrangement.

Government assistance programmes

The guidance notes that businesses in some industries are more able to pass on costs, or more pressured to share subsidies with their customers than are businesses in other industries. Therefore, calculating the impact of government actions for the purposes of comparability analysis also requires an analysis of the degree of competition in the industry. In addition, it is stated that government assistance should only be “shared” where a) the other party would also have met the criteria for the assistance and b) arm’s-length parties would have agreed to share the assistance.

Advance Pricing Agreements

Unsurprisingly, the guidance states that APAs should be respected unless the pandemic has changed one of the fundamental assumptions underpinning them. Unfortunately, this can only be determined on a case-by-case basis. It is up to the taxpayer to make this determination and warn the tax authorities if it has happened. However, tax authorities are asked to wait for sufficient information to become available before making any decision to revise, cancel or revoke an APA.

Action points

Taxpayers are advised to:

  • calculate and document the impact of the pandemic on their business;
  • alert the tax administration to any likely breach of a critical APA assumption;
  • review whether existing related party agreements would permit certain costs or revenues to be shared and, in any case, whether it is in the longer-term interests of the parties to do so; and
  • adjust benchmarks before applying them to the current situation.

Zie ook : Arendt ( Mr. Eric Fort ,  Mr. Alain Goebel )

[+ http://www.arendt.com]

Mr. Eric Fort Mr. Eric Fort
Partner
eric.fort@arendt.com
Mr. Alain Goebel Mr. Alain Goebel
Partner
alain.goebel@arendt.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
Alle artikels Vennootschapsbelasting

Laatste artikels Vennootschapsbelasting

EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions updated: Implications for Luxembourg taxpayers
22/02/2021

Today, the EU Council updated the EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions. The update is an important step as it dire...

Read more

Bill of law passed approving the Protocol to the Luxembourg-Russia Tax Treaty
11/02/2021

At the request of the Russian authorities, Luxembourg and the Russian Federation agreed to amend the Treaty, signing the P...

Read more

New law on payments to EU ‘black-list’ countries
01/02/2021

On 28 January 2021, the Luxembourg Parliament approved bill of law n°7547 implementing measures concerning the non-tax...

Read more

Measure denying the tax deduction of interest and royalties due to entities in blacklisted jurisd...
29/01/2021

Yesterday, the draft law which introduces a measure denying under certain conditions the corporate income tax deduction of...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Eric Fort

Bill of law passed approving the Protocol to the Luxembourg-Russia Tax Treaty
11/02/2021

At the request of the Russian authorities, Luxembourg and the Russian Federation agreed to amend the Treaty, signing the P...

Read more

New law on payments to EU ‘black-list’ countries
01/02/2021

On 28 January 2021, the Luxembourg Parliament approved bill of law n°7547 implementing measures concerning the non-tax...

Read more

Luxembourg 2021 budget law passed, new tax measures introduced
17/12/2020

On 15 December 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament approved the 2021 budget bill.

Read more

New Luxembourg circular letter on the participation exemption regime regarding Gibraltar companies
04/12/2020

llowing the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling of 2 April 2020 in case C-458-181, the Luxembourg direct tax authoritie...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Alain Goebel

Bill of law passed approving the Protocol to the Luxembourg-Russia Tax Treaty
11/02/2021

At the request of the Russian authorities, Luxembourg and the Russian Federation agreed to amend the Treaty, signing the P...

Read more

New law on payments to EU ‘black-list’ countries
01/02/2021

On 28 January 2021, the Luxembourg Parliament approved bill of law n°7547 implementing measures concerning the non-tax...

Read more

Luxembourg 2021 budget law passed, new tax measures introduced
17/12/2020

On 15 December 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament approved the 2021 budget bill.

Read more

New Luxembourg circular letter on the participation exemption regime regarding Gibraltar companies
04/12/2020

llowing the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling of 2 April 2020 in case C-458-181, the Luxembourg direct tax authoritie...

Read more

LexGO Network