LexGo

The BlackRock VAT case: an impossible combination of artificial intelligence and the VAT exemption?
06/07/2020

On 2 July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled in the case of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd (C-231/19) that a “single supply” of management services, provided by a third-party supplier via a software platform for the benefit of a fund management company managing both special investment funds and other funds, does not fall within the VAT exemption provision.

Background

BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd (“BlackRock”) was a company responsible for the management of funds: mainly non-special investment funds (“non-SIFs”), but also special investment funds (“SIFs”). In this context, BlackRock used the services of BlackRock Financial Management Inc. in the US (“BFMI”) through an IT platform. These services spanned the entire investment cycle (performance and risk analysis as well as monitoring to enable the portfolio managers to make investment and trading decisions, alongside the monitoring of regulatory compliance). UK VAT was self-assessed on the full remuneration paid to BFMI.

As a portion of the services received from BFMI went to manage SIFs, BlackRock claimed the application of the VAT exemption for that portion of the services, requesting a corresponding VAT refund. After being rejected by the UK tax authorities, the case was brought before the CJEU, raising the issue that a single service having a dual use would imply two different VAT treatments.

CJEU judgment

To put the ruling in context, note that the CJEU follows the approach of the Advocate General (“AG”) held in its Opinion dated 11 March 2020 regarding the notion of a single supply, and confirms that the relevant supply of services via the software platform (constituted by the combined use of various functions of the platform) must be seen “as forming a single indivisible economic supply”. 

As regards the VAT treatment applicable to such single supply, the CJEU held that a single supply must necessarily be subject to one and the same VAT treatment.

In this respect, the CJEU stated that the decision of whether to apply the specific VAT exemption provision for fund management must be based solely on the nature of the services supplied (and not on their uses, or on the nature of the majority of the managed funds). Furthermore, based on settled case law, the CJEU recalled that in order to be VAT-exempt, “the services provided by a third-party manager must, viewed broadly, form a distinct whole fulfilling in effect the specific, essential functions of the management of SIFs”. It stated that this condition is not met in the case at hand because the software services may be used in the same way for the management of SIFs and non-SIFs. 

The CJEU has thus concluded that the services provided by BFMI via the software platform for SIFs and non-SIFs constitute a single service for VAT purposes, and one which does not benefit from the VAT exemption for investment fund management services.

As this outcome may have a direct impact on Luxembourg fund managers and their relations with third-party suppliers, it is advisable to review existing structuring in light of the above judgment.

 

Zie ook : Arendt ( Mr. Bruno Gasparotto ,  Mrs. Sophie Weyten ,  Mr. Nicolas Conrad ,  Mrs. Claire Schmitt )

[+ http://www.arendt.com]

Mr. Bruno Gasparotto Mr. Bruno Gasparotto
Partner
bruno.gasparotto@arendt.com
Mrs. Sophie Weyten Mrs. Sophie Weyten
Counsel
sophie.weyten@arendt.com
Mr. Nicolas Conrad Mr. Nicolas Conrad
Counsel
nicolas.conrad@arendt.com
Mrs. Claire Schmitt Mrs. Claire Schmitt
Senior Associate
claire.schmitt@arendt.com

Alle artikels BTW

Laatste artikels BTW

Significant VAT decision regarding company cars in Luxembourg
22/02/2021

The Administration de l’Enregistrement, des Domaines et de la TVA (the Luxembourg VAT authorities) confirmed in ...

Read more

New VAT burden on company cars?
25/01/2021

On 20 January 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling in a case that raised the question o...

Read more

Overview of the VAT impacts of Brexit
15/01/2021

It is therefore important to review the VAT treatment of cross-border transactions with the UK. Below you will find a brie...

Overview of the VAT impacts of Brexit Read more

Overview of the VAT impacts of Brexit
12/01/2021

With the end of the transition period as of 1 January 2021, the UK officially became a third country with respect to the E...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Bruno Gasparotto

New VAT burden on company cars?
25/01/2021

On 20 January 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling in a case that raised the question o...

Read more

Overview of the VAT impacts of Brexit
12/01/2021

With the end of the transition period as of 1 January 2021, the UK officially became a third country with respect to the E...

Read more

Luxembourg 2021 budget law passed, new tax measures introduced
17/12/2020

On 15 December 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament approved the 2021 budget bill.

Read more

CJEU: new developments in the realm of VAT recovery on dead deal costs
20/11/2020

In the context of a prospective acquisition of shares in a company in the telecommunications sector, and with the intentio...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mrs. Sophie Weyten

VAT “Quick Fixes”: simplifications and challenges for Luxembourg businesses
22/01/2020

On 23 December 2019, the Luxembourg VAT authorities issued Circular n°799, outlining the main legislative changes in L...

Read more

Rent free period and lease contracts: new VAT developments
25/07/2019

The rent free period commonly granted in office lease contracts has been the source of much heated debate with the Luxembo...

Read more

VAT Circular on transactions between related parties
25/01/2019

On 18 January 2019, the Luxembourg VAT authorities published a new Circular (N°790), which clarifies the provisions of...

Read more

CJEU: Open door for VAT recovery on transaction costs in case of share disposal
15/11/2018

On 8 November 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) released its decision in the C&D F...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Nicolas Conrad

New VAT burden on company cars?
25/01/2021

On 20 January 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling in a case that raised the question o...

Read more

VAT “Quick Fixes”: simplifications and challenges for Luxembourg businesses
22/01/2020

On 23 December 2019, the Luxembourg VAT authorities issued Circular n°799, outlining the main legislative changes in L...

Read more

Rent free period and lease contracts: new VAT developments
25/07/2019

The rent free period commonly granted in office lease contracts has been the source of much heated debate with the Luxembo...

Read more

VAT Circular on transactions between related parties
25/01/2019

On 18 January 2019, the Luxembourg VAT authorities published a new Circular (N°790), which clarifies the provisions of...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mrs. Claire Schmitt

Overview of the VAT impacts of Brexit
12/01/2021

With the end of the transition period as of 1 January 2021, the UK officially became a third country with respect to the E...

Read more

VAT “Quick Fixes”: simplifications and challenges for Luxembourg businesses
22/01/2020

On 23 December 2019, the Luxembourg VAT authorities issued Circular n°799, outlining the main legislative changes in L...

Read more

Rent free period and lease contracts: new VAT developments
25/07/2019

The rent free period commonly granted in office lease contracts has been the source of much heated debate with the Luxembo...

Read more

VAT Circular on transactions between related parties
25/01/2019

On 18 January 2019, the Luxembourg VAT authorities published a new Circular (N°790), which clarifies the provisions of...

Read more

LexGO Network