LexGo

CJEU: Open door for VAT recovery on transaction costs in case of share disposal
15/11/2018

On 8 November 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) released its decision in the C&D Foods Acquisition ApS case (C-502/17) concerning the deduction of input VAT on consultancy costs incurred by a holding company in connection with a sale of a sub-subsidiary’s shares.

C&D Foods carried out 2 activities, respectively the holding of shares in its subsidiary, Arovit Holding A/S, and the provision of taxable management services to its sub-subsidiary, Arovit Petfood. Due to the bank failure of the former shareholder of the Arovit group, the creditor, Kaupthing Bank, assumed ownership of the group and intended to sell all the shares of Arovit Petfood in order to satisfy its debts. For the purpose of this sale, C&D Foods incurred advisory costs and subsequently sought to recover the input VAT on such costs even though the sale in question ultimately never took place.

The CJEU ruled that a sale of shares, in itself, does not constitute an economic activity, implying that no deduction of input VAT on related costs can be granted. However, if the direct and exclusive reason for the share sale relates to the taxable activity of the parent company, or constitutes a direct, permanent and necessary extension of the parent company’s taxable activity, a VAT deduction right may be recognised. According to the CJEU, this would be the case if a sale of shares is carried out with the purpose of allocating the proceeds directly to the taxable activity of the parent company or to the economic activity carried out by the group of which it is the parent company.

In the case at hand, since it was clear that the objective of the sale of shares was to settle the Kaupthing Bank’s debts, such a sale could not be viewed as being performed either for the purposes of the taxable activities of C&D Foods or for the economic activities of Arovit group.

Compared to previous CJEU case law (such as BLP case C-4/94), VAT deduction on share disposal costs is now possible in specific circumstances. In particular, attention should be paid to the underlying purpose of the transaction in order to determine the VAT recovery right on share disposal costs. This being said, this case is casuistic and raises questions such as to what extent and how far should a company have regard to the underlying purpose of a share disposal. On a positive note, this decision actually opens possibilities for holding companies to claim their VAT recovery right on share sale costs. Henceforth, detailed documentation relating to the objective of a divestment of shares might serve as additional arguments to support VAT recovery on the connected costs.

Zie ook : Arendt ( Mr. Bruno Gasparotto ,  Mrs. Sophie Weyten ,  Mr. Nicolas Conrad ,  Mrs. Claire Schmitt )

[+ http://www.arendt.com]

Mr. Bruno Gasparotto Mr. Bruno Gasparotto
Principal
bruno.gasparotto@arendt.com
Mrs. Sophie Weyten Mrs. Sophie Weyten
Counsel
sophie.weyten@arendt.com
Mr. Nicolas Conrad Mr. Nicolas Conrad
Senior Associate
nicolas.conrad@arendt.com
Mrs. Claire Schmitt Mrs. Claire Schmitt
Senior Associate
claire.schmitt@arendt.com

Click here to see the ad(s)
Alle artikels BTW

Laatste artikels BTW

New tax measures revealed in the coalition agreement published by the future government – ATAD Bi...
07/12/2018

Further to the elections for Parliament held in October this year, the former ruling coalition between the liberal, ecolog...

Read more

Brexit relocations: The view from CMS Luxembourg
26/11/2018

Luxembourg’s well-established reputation as a leading financial centre makes it a natural candidate for financial co...

Read more

CJEU: VAT on share disposal costs recoverable in certain cases
12/11/2018

VAT on costs incurred in connection with an envisaged share disposal is in principle not recoverable. However, if the reas...

Read more

The German Federal Tax Court limits German CFC rules and anti-abuse provisions to wholly artifici...
24/10/2018

In a decision of the German Federal Tax Court (GFTC) from 13 June 2018 (Decision I R 94/15 published on 17 October 2018), ...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Bruno Gasparotto

VAT group legislation voted
30/07/2018

The bill of law n°7278 implementing the VAT group into Luxembourg law, as outlined in our previous Newsflash on 1...

Read more

Unrestricted VAT deduction for active holding companies
11/07/2018

On 5 July 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) released a welcome decision in the Marle P...

Read more

Deduction of input VAT on abort costs
14/05/2018

On 3 May 2018, Advocate General (“AG”) Kokott delivered her opinion in the Ryanair case (C-249/17) concerning ...

Read more

Introduction of the Luxembourg VAT group regime (bill of law n°7278)
19/04/2018

On 13 April 2018, the Luxembourg Government introduced the bill of law n°7278 before the Parliament. This bill will im...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mrs. Sophie Weyten

VAT group legislation voted
30/07/2018

The bill of law n°7278 implementing the VAT group into Luxembourg law, as outlined in our previous Newsflash on 1...

Read more

Unrestricted VAT deduction for active holding companies
11/07/2018

On 5 July 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) released a welcome decision in the Marle P...

Read more

Deduction of input VAT on abort costs
14/05/2018

On 3 May 2018, Advocate General (“AG”) Kokott delivered her opinion in the Ryanair case (C-249/17) concerning ...

Read more

Introduction of the Luxembourg VAT group regime (bill of law n°7278)
19/04/2018

On 13 April 2018, the Luxembourg Government introduced the bill of law n°7278 before the Parliament. This bill will im...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mr. Nicolas Conrad

VAT group legislation voted
30/07/2018

The bill of law n°7278 implementing the VAT group into Luxembourg law, as outlined in our previous Newsflash on 1...

Read more

Unrestricted VAT deduction for active holding companies
11/07/2018

On 5 July 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) released a welcome decision in the Marle P...

Read more

Deduction of input VAT on abort costs
14/05/2018

On 3 May 2018, Advocate General (“AG”) Kokott delivered her opinion in the Ryanair case (C-249/17) concerning ...

Read more

Introduction of the Luxembourg VAT group regime (bill of law n°7278)
19/04/2018

On 13 April 2018, the Luxembourg Government introduced the bill of law n°7278 before the Parliament. This bill will im...

Read more

Laatste artikels van Mrs. Claire Schmitt

VAT group legislation voted
30/07/2018

The bill of law n°7278 implementing the VAT group into Luxembourg law, as outlined in our previous Newsflash on 1...

Read more

Unrestricted VAT deduction for active holding companies
11/07/2018

On 5 July 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) released a welcome decision in the Marle P...

Read more

Deduction of input VAT on abort costs
14/05/2018

On 3 May 2018, Advocate General (“AG”) Kokott delivered her opinion in the Ryanair case (C-249/17) concerning ...

Read more

Introduction of the Luxembourg VAT group regime (bill of law n°7278)
19/04/2018

On 13 April 2018, the Luxembourg Government introduced the bill of law n°7278 before the Parliament. This bill will im...

Read more

LexGO Network