qui rappelle les principes applicables au recours contre une ordonnance déclarant exécutoire une sentence arbitrale étrangère dans le Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. En l’espèce, l’appelante avait soulevé la contrariété à l’ordre public luxembourgeois comme motif de refus d’exequatur.
Since the EU Court of Justice made its ruling on the right to be forgotten in May 2014, the topic has been in the media almost incessantly. Most of the debate concerns matters of principle: does the right amount to censorship, who is permitted to exercise the right and under what conditions, and does it actually benefit privacy? As new cases continue to come up, the EU is working hard to provide guidelines, fact sheets and myth-busting documents to explain why the ruling makes sense.
