LexGo

New VAT burden on company cars?
25/01/2021

On 20 January 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling in a case that raised the question of whether the provision of a company car to an employee is subject to VAT (C-288/19, QM v Finanzamt Saarbrücken).

The CJEU assessed the facts of a case involving an employee whose employer provided him with a company car for both professional and private use free of charge, i.e. without any remuneration having been agreed for this provision. In particular,

  • the employee rendered no payment for the vehicle made available to him,
  • he gave up no part of his remuneration as consideration for it, and
  • his entitlement to use the vehicle was not contingent on his forgoing other benefits.

The CJEU ruled that under such circumstances, the act of making a vehicle available to an employee did not constitute a supply of services “for consideration”, and that Article 56(2) of the EU VAT Directive (under which the long-term hiring of a means of transport to a private customer shall be subject to VAT in the customer’s country of residence) did not apply. Instead, the particular rules for the private use of company assets were to be observed (i.e. Article 26(1) of the EU VAT Directive).

By contrast, the CJEU clarified that the provision of a company car to an employee for consideration will be subject to VAT, as a long-term hiring of a means of transport, where all of the following conditions are met:

  • the employee has an uninterrupted right to use the company car for private purposes and to exclude other persons from using it
  • in exchange for rent
  • for an agreed period of more than 30 days.

Under these circumstances, the provision of the company car to the employee does constitute a supply of services “for consideration”, and the agreed rent (which may be paid directly, in the form of a partial salary waiver, or otherwise) is subject to VAT in the employee’s country of residence.

Thus, in a cross-border scenario (i.e. in the case of an employer whose employee resides in another EU Member State), the employer is obligated to properly assess, declare and pay this VAT in the employee’s country of residence.

It should be noted that this reasoning by the CJEU applies irrespective of whether the employer is the legal owner of the vehicle, or has a different right of disposal over it (e.g. under a lease).

If your company provides company cars to employees, it will be important to closely monitor the response of the Luxembourg VAT authorities and the tax authorities of our neighbouring countries to this CJEU case-law.

 

Voir aussi : Arendt ( Mr. Bruno Gasparotto ,  Mr. Nicolas Conrad )

[+ http://www.arendt.com]

Mr. Bruno Gasparotto Mr. Bruno Gasparotto
Partner
[email protected]
Mr. Nicolas Conrad Mr. Nicolas Conrad
Counsel
[email protected]

Click here to see the ad(s)
Tous les articles TVA

Derniers articles TVA

VAT deduction right of Lux PropCos owning/exploiting German real estate – VAT changes
08/09/2021

In its decision C-931/19 (“Titanium case”), the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ru...

VAT deduction right of Lux PropCos owning/exploiting German real estate – VAT changes Read more

VAT e-commerce package for B2C transactions
06/07/2021

A VAT e-commerce package for business-to-consumer (B2C) transactions came into force as from 1 July 2021.

VAT e-commerce package for B2C transactions Read more

Favourable CJEU clarification on the VAT exemption for fund management services
22/06/2021

On 17 June 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered its judgment in joined cases K (C-58...

Favourable CJEU clarification on the VAT exemption for fund management services Read more

Further guidance from the ECJ on VAT exemption for the management of special investment funds
22/06/2021

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that the VAT exemption for the ‘management of special investment funds&rsq...

Further guidance from the ECJ on VAT exemption for the management of special investment funds Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Bruno Gasparotto

Property companies holding real estate assets in Germany – state of play on the input VAT deduc...
17/09/2021

The case concerned a Jersey-based company, Titanium Ltd (‘Titanium’), involved in real estate and asset manage...

Read more

Overview of the VAT impacts of Brexit
12/01/2021

With the end of the transition period as of 1 January 2021, the UK officially became a third country with respect to the E...

Read more

Luxembourg 2021 budget law passed, new tax measures introduced
17/12/2020

On 15 December 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament approved the 2021 budget bill.

Read more

CJEU: new developments in the realm of VAT recovery on dead deal costs
20/11/2020

In the context of a prospective acquisition of shares in a company in the telecommunications sector, and with the intentio...

Read more

Derniers articles de Mr. Nicolas Conrad

The BlackRock VAT case: an impossible combination of artificial intelligence and the VAT exemption?
06/07/2020

On 2 July 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled in the case of BlackRock Investment ...

Read more

VAT “Quick Fixes”: simplifications and challenges for Luxembourg businesses
22/01/2020

On 23 December 2019, the Luxembourg VAT authorities issued Circular n°799, outlining the main legislative changes in L...

Read more

Rent free period and lease contracts: new VAT developments
25/07/2019

The rent free period commonly granted in office lease contracts has been the source of much heated debate with the Luxembo...

Read more

VAT Circular on transactions between related parties
25/01/2019

On 18 January 2019, the Luxembourg VAT authorities published a new Circular (N°790), which clarifies the provisions of...

Read more

LexGO Network