LexGo

Parallel structures: the Luxembourg solution
02/02/2021

Parallel investment funds have increasingly become a preferred structure for sophisticated private equity fund managers seeking to access capital with multi-jurisdictional solutions.

A parallel funds structure is composed of side-by-side vehicle(s) which invest and divest alongside the main fund, usually on a pro rata basis per their commitments and at the same time, in a common portfolio of assets. Operational terms of the parallel fund are similar to those of the main one, and include a common investment policy and common asset targets. The differences between them are mainly due to regulatory or operational reasons.

In practice, global private equity asset managers have to reconcile the concerns of various types of investors in various jurisdictions. Investors' ability to invest in a traditional single main investment vehicle may be restricted as they have specific tax and/or regulatory requirements which cannot be accommodated . In a parallel fund structure, a greater range of investors may be reached by offering customised solutions and, as an example, a choice between onshore and offshore jurisdictions. Besides that, investors are able to maintain their target investments, while choosing the fund adapted to their particular risk profile, regulatory requirements and tax appetite. Regulatory costs, which might occur in a specific jurisdiction can be restricted without any correlative financial impact on the main fund. The size of a main fund and some of its parallel funds may not be the same. Parallel funds allow a larger investment pool and an easier and faster reach of their target size and investment objectives. If appropriate, investors of the main and parallel funds may also be aggregated to determine voting rights on the structure level.

Parallel fund structures are of course raising a number of operational challenges in practice and should be designed for sizeable funds only. Structuring challenges which a private equity initiator might come across in planning and operating the fund might be linked to ensuring equal treatment of investors and a balance in voting rights, as well as navigating different reporting obligations and steering different vehicles while ensuring adequate cost allocation and the distribution waterfall which will enable remediation of the initiator through an appropriate delegation model.

Luxembourg has historically been a jurisdiction of choice for fund sponsors seeking to access European capital through the appointment of an authorised AIFM and obtaining a European passport for marketing purposes. Local regulatory environment offers a flexible and varied corporate toolbox, providing fund sponsors with a wide range of corporate and product options to choose from.

Luxembourg and Cayman or Delaware meet halfway as well established funds jurisdictions, maintaining highest global governance standards and the interest to the institutional investors. Regulatory regimes demonstrate sufficient similarities, namely concerning the Luxembourg special limited partnership and the Cayman or Delaware limited partnership, which enables managers to operate funds in parallel in the context of familiarity with the product characteristics and the time to market efficiency.

Due to its flexibility and access to an European passport (through the AIFM), Luxembourg offers the possibility to structure a fund vehicle in parallel to a main fund vehicle in Cayman Islands or Delaware, allowing for each to be co-managed and target the same portfolio while meeting the different requirements of investors in different jurisdictions.

Voir aussi : Ogier ( Anne-Gaëlle Delabye )

[+ http://www.ogier.com]

 Anne-Gaëlle Delabye Anne-Gaëlle Delabye
Partner
[email protected]

Click here to see the ad(s)
Tous les articles Droit financier

Derniers articles Droit financier

New rules on material IT outsourcing in the financial sector
15/10/2021

Effective 15 October 2021, financial institutions must notify the CSSF of any planned outsourcing of material IT activitie...

Read more

Payments services and e-money | New delegated regulation
15/10/2021

On 28 September 2021, the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1722 of 18 June 2021 (the “Regulation”), s...

Payments services and e-money | New delegated regulation Read more

Performance fees: the CSSF digitalises data collection
12/10/2021

Investment fund managers must report to the CSSF on the performance fee models used by all Luxembourg UCITS and AIFs that ...

Performance fees: the CSSF digitalises data collection Read more

Public Country-by-Country Reporting Directive adopted by the EU Council
11/10/2021

On 28 September 2021, more than five years after it was first tabled, the so-called “public Country-by-Country Repor...

Read more

Derniers articles de Anne-Gaëlle Delabye

Loan origination - CSSF guidance on private lending
22/07/2021

On 15 June 2021, the Luxembourg Financial Sector Supervisory Authority (the CSSF) updated its FAQs on the statuses of...

Read more

CSSF fast-track procedure for fund managers to comply with SFDR disclosure rules
04/01/2021

The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the CSSF), has issued a communication (the CSSF C...

Read more

FCA communication to Luxembourg-based entities about the UK temporary permissions regime
23/11/2020

On 19 November 2020 the Luxembourg supervisory authority for the financial sector, the CSSF, issued press release 20/...

Read more

CSSF on mandatory notifications in a no-deal Brexit context
18/07/2019

Following the publication of Luxembourg laws of 8 April 2019[1] (see our previous briefing here), the Luxembourg...

Read more

LexGO Network